Banksy Unveiling tonight 7.30pm sharp
CLERKENWELL GREEN, LONDON EC1
Banksy Unveiling tonight 7.30pm sharp
CLERKENWELL GREEN, LONDON EC1
Something for the ‘crasher kids;
For right thinking folk there is a cool review of of the Bourne Supremacy on Salon (subscription or free-day pass required). Ludlum’s Jason Bourne series were books that I read when I was 12 and 13, I guess they were the Rudyard Kipling of my day.
On another note, I must say I think Salon’s day pass scheme is one of the best ideas I have seen in making online advertising pay for media owners. Oh yeah, the film is supposed to be very good.
Maxium kudos to Dwayne Hendricks of the Interesting People mailing list for flagging this up.
TiVo vs. the Broadcast Flag Wavers By Rob Pegoraro The Washington Post Sunday, August 1, 2004; Page F06
TiVo, the company that makes the digital-video-recorder boxes that inspire such strange idolatry among their users, is in a weird spot. It’s asking the Federal Communications Commission for permission to add a new feature — the option for a TiVo user to send recorded digital TV programs via the Internet to nine other people.
Huh? Permission? Doesn’t the government’s involvement in consumer electronics stop with making sure that a gadget doesn’t jam your neighbor’s reception or electrocute you? Since when do the feds get to vote on product designs?
The answer is, since last November, when the FCC voted to require manufacturers to support the “broadcast flag” system by July 1 of next year. This convoluted mechanism aims to stop full-quality copies of digital broadcasts from circulating on the Internet.
The FCC didn’t mandate any one anti-file-sharing scheme and instead invited companies to submit their own proposals, which brings us to TiVo’s vaguely Soviet predicament. Among the schemes a handful of firms have proposed, only TiVo’s would allow tightly controlled online transfers of recorded programs.
For this, the company has drawn the ire of the National Football League and the Motion Picture Association of America, which have asked the FCC to deny TiVo’s proposal. The NFL says that TiVo’s Internet-sharing feature will allow people to send game broadcasts to blacked-out viewers in real time (a team’s home game can be aired locally only if it sells out beforehand). “It’s a question of pure ability to sell tickets,” said Frank Hawkins, the NFL’s senior vice president for business affairs. “Buffalo typically sells out September and October, but they’ve got an open-air stadium. They’ll never sell out those December games if they are unable to enforce the blackout rule.” This is an important point:
The NFL is not asking the FCC to protect its television business — never mind that the flag exists only to stop indiscriminate file sharing, not cure every copyright-infringement issue. No, the NFL is asking for help with a stadium business, one that already benefits from massive government welfare. (A December 2002 Buffalo News story calculated that the taxpayers of Erie County, N.Y., had anted up about $148 million for the Bills and their stadium over the previous decade.) In other words, the league is asking manufacturers and viewers to further subsidize team owners who are already gorging themselves at the public trough. There’s also the slight problem that the NFL’s nightmare — blacked-out viewers watching a game live on the Internet — is all but impossible. With almost every broadband connection available today, it would take hours to upload a game. A recipient would be lucky to finish watching a Sunday afternoon game before Monday, and sending a high-definition copy would take most of the week.
Jim Burger, a lawyer for TiVo, fumed about the NFL’s complaint: “Maybe their engineers understand how to inflate a football, but I don’t think they understand encoded, encrypted MPEG-2,” TiVo’s tightly secured format. Whenever full-quality, real-time video on the Internet does become commonplace, I expect to see the NFL capitalizing on it instead of complaining, just as it has profited from such earlier advances as satellite TV. The MPAA, meanwhile, says that the way TiVo would allow customers to share recordings online with people who may not be friends or family members amounts to indiscriminate redistribution. The Washington-based group wants TiVo to impose an “affinity requirement,” said Fritz Attaway, its executive vice president for government relations.
But how can TiVo tell if the people to whom you’ve sent a program are really friends and family without launching its own Total Information Awareness program? Attaway called that “a good question.” Until that can be answered, his lobby contends that the safest course is to block Internet sharing — after all, he noted, you can just pop a DVD in the mail. What the MPAA and the NFL overlook is that every TiVo box includes analog video outputs that can’t enforce copy controls. These allow these devices to work with the millions of TV sets lacking digital inputs, but they also let anybody plug a TiVo into a computer to upload video at will. The FCC has already ruled out proposals to eliminate or deactivate analog outputs. (“We’ll probably have to go to Congress to enact legislation to deal with that,” Attaway said.)
If the problem the MPAA and the NFL describe is real, the remedy they seek won’t solve it. Understand that TiVo itself is no hero. Its proposed system is thoroughly hobbled. The people to whom you’d send recordings online would need you to add them to a “secure viewing group” by ordering special security keys for their Windows computers, associated with your TiVo bill. Each viewer would need to plug one such key into a PC to receive, watch or edit your recordings. Left on its own, the market could give TiVo’s system its appropriate reward. Except we don’t have a free market in digital television — the FCC guaranteed that by approving the broadcast flag.
The MPAA and the NFL phrase their objections as reasonable attempts to err on the side of caution. “We’re asking them to just wait awhile, let’s think it out more thoroughly,” Attaway said. But if a programmer or an engineer with a bright idea has to go to Washington, hat in hand and lawyers in tow, to request permission to sell a better product — and is then told “just wait awhile” — we are on our way to suffocating innovation in this country. Living with technology, or trying to? E-mail Rob Pegoraro at email@example.com.
Beverage monster Coca-Cola has put some clever viral clips on the web in a cunning ploy to target early beverage adopters with its new apple flavour Fanta, aside from lacking a human LD50 serving of caffiene its bright process green colour an artificial taste could make it an ideal rival to Mountain Dew for a late-night coding marathon or LAN party. Makes up for the dumb marketing tactics used to promote their signature drinks brand recently in the US; though the Doom3 clip ending could be viewed in bad taste when one considers the recent controversy of life imitating the Rockstar North’s Manhunt console game with the murder of a school boy in England.
According to Dow Jones, Steve Jobs has taken August off to recover from cancer surgery:Apple CEO Jobs Has Surgery To Remove Cancerous Tumor
Sunday August 1, 11:45 PM EDT
NEW YORK — Steve Jobs, chief executive of personal computer maker Apple Computer Inc. (AAPL) and animation studio Pixar Animation Studio (PIXR), underwent surgery to remove a cancerous tumor in his pancreas over the weekend, Monday’s Wall Street Journal reported.
The surgery was successful and Mr. Jobs will return to work in September, an Apple spokeswoman said.
Mr. Jobs, 49 years old, disclosed the news about his surgery in a memo that he sent to staffers at Apple, Cupertino, Calif., on Sunday. In the memo, Mr. Jobs told Apple employees that he had a rare form of pancreatic cancer, called islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which can be cured by surgery if removed in time. Mr. Jobs’s tumor was diagnosed in time, he said, and he won’t require any chemotherapy or radiation treatment.
Mr. Jobs, who co-founded Apple in the 1970s, said in the memo that he will take August off, returning to work in September. During his absence, Tim Cook, who heads up operations, sales and Macintosh hardware at Apple, will run the computer maker’s day-to-day operations.
Wall Street Journal Staff Reporter Pui-Wing Tam contributed to this report.
Dow Jones Newswires
According to ThinkSecret here is Steve’s memo that he sent out the Apple workforce
Team,I have some personal news that I need to share with you, and I wanted you to hear it directly from me.This weekend I underwent a successful surgery to remove a cancerous tumor from my pancreas.
I had a very rare form of pancreatic cancer called an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which represents about 1 percent of the total cases of pancreatic cancer diagnosed each year, and can be cured by surgical removal if diagnosed in time (mine was).
I will not require any chemotherapy or radiation treatments.The far more common form of pancreatic cancer is called adenocarcinoma, which is currently not curable and usually carries a life expectancy of around one year after diagnosis.
I mention this because when one hears “pancreatic cancer” (or Googles it), one immediately encounters this far more common and deadly form, which, thank god, is not what I had.I will be recuperating during the month of August, and expect to return to work in September.
While I’m out, I’ve asked Tim Cook to be responsible for Apple’s day to day operations, so we shouldn’t miss a beat. I’m sure I’ll be calling some of you way too much in August, and I look forward to seeing you in September.
PS: I’m sending this from my hospital bed using my 17-inch PowerBook and an Airport Express.GET WELL SOON STEVE!