What does success look like? (For PR campaigns)

The estimated reading time for this post is 115 seconds

What does success look like for PR campaigns? In public relations circles measuring success is as much a discussion point as the weather. The industry has attempted to deal with it. In this approach they generally have a goal to reach a singular solution. Rather like ‘how to write a press release’.

But in reality all measurement revolves around one question. What does success look like? It could also framed as:

• What is the job required?
• What is the problem to solve?

Measuring success then breaks down into four categories:

• • Outputs (how much activity has happened)
    • Amount of content
    • Paid, earned and shared distribution / reach including serendipitous engagement
    • Events / stunts
  • Outcomes
    • Views / opportunities to see / audience
    • Attendance
    • Followers
    • Propagation (shares, mentions, backlinks etc). One could also consider mentions or shares serendipitous engagement alongside comments or retweets
    • Competitor or category benchmarking (share of voice)
  • Trend-focused outcomes, where the rate of change is as important as absolute values
    • Sentiment – though measuring sentiment is time for an article in itself
    • Pre-and-post or regular stakeholder research (brand perception, talkability, recall, message penetration)
    • Referral traffic (normalised for seasonality and ongoing activity)
    • Awards, reviews or recommendations
    • Stakeholder behavourial changes
    • Platform behaviour change (basket size, conversion rates, downloads, sign-ups)
  • Organisational success measures
    • Sales increase
    • Reduction in time to sale
    • Behavioural change (particular for non-commercial organisations)
    • Reputation improvement (share price increase, stakeholder net promoter score improvement, increased influence)
    • Talent acqusition (increased applications per job, increased proactive applications, reduced staff churn)
    • Financial security (funding round, share placement, share price, bond placement)

The problem of measurement from a PR perspective breaks down into a number of parts:

• The activity didn’t have a clear link to organisational success
• The basket of measures wasn’t considered in-depth at the beginning
• The goals change over time, or are post rationalised
• The resources aren’t dedicated on measurement that need to be done
• Some measures derived can’t be separated from other work done except through the use of econometrics
• The measures used lend themselves to long term campaigns, yet are measured on a short term basis
• The span of responsibility that the activity has to deliver isn’t matched by access to the internal data required to measure success

More PR related content here. More from AMEC; PR’s measurement trade body here.