Category Archives: business

Big food troubles and the cola wars

Just over a week ago Coca-Cola announced measures to to deal with the social issue of obesity. It was an interesting move and on the surface of it a victory for pressure groups looking to tackle ‘Big Food’ related issues. The less charitable could also argue that Coca-Cola is trying to make a CSR (corporate and social responsiblity) silver lining out of likely future regulation. There is a policy tide against soft drinks companies, an example of this is the recent proposed legislation to ban  sugary drinks in individual servings of 16 fluid ounces (just under 1/2 litre) by Michael Bloomberg’s administration in New York.

The European Union has looked at ensuring consumers are better informed about the calorific values of soft drinks by changing labeling.

To be fair Coca-Cola has a reputation of doing things that are both good for business and good for the wider society. From using its extensive distribution network to get vaccines into far flung parts of the developing world to a relentless approach to drive down the use of packaging increase recycling.

The timing of these changes is well-chosen as it puts blue ocean between Coca-Cola and competitors, in particular PepsiCo. PepsiCo is trying to regain ground that it had lost under the leadership of Indra Noovi.

Pepsi had a mis-balanced business that focused too much on the developed world. It also tried to change too many things within its business at once. Pepsi has tried to move to be a healthy food provider and invest (often too expensively) in developing world markets. Which increased the amount of debt that the company carries.

One noticeable miss-step from a marketing point of view was that PepsiCo misunderstood and miss-used social media marketing in its efforts. It did many tactical things right, like the Gatorade listening room but it made some crucial errors. In particular, the Refresh campaign which diverted TV advertising money into a social-led CSR programme. PepsiCo put too much trust in social media marketing to shift product and cut spend in traditional marketing techniques. Eventually the company had to make redundancies to cobble together 500 million dollars from the savings in order to try and get its marketing back on track.

I can see signs that other groups focusing on the bleeding edge of social business such as snack food group Mondelēz International could make as well unless pragmatism gets to trump visionary zeal.

In the same way that Proctor & Gamble came out of the great depression stronger by building a competitive advantage through advertising, Coca-Cola is likely to get a similar advantage by setting the bar higher for competitors.

More information
Coca-Cola says it will drive obesity battle with calorie counts | The Guardian
NYC soda ban would lead customers to consume more sugary drinks, study suggests | CBS News
Judge Blocks New York City’s Limits on Big Sugary Drinks | New York Times
UK Soft Drinks Report 2012 | British Soft Drinks Association (PDF)
Sodas on the Defensive – WPP
Indra Nooyi’s Pepsi challenge – Fortune Management
Pepsi Pours Fortune Into Marketing Drinks, Indulgent Snacks | News – Advertising Age
PepsiCo, A-B InBev Strengthen Ties with Joint In-Store Marketing Program | Advertising Age

Why are Windows 8 sales apparently slowing down the PC market?

From the changing interface to an absence of a start button, the analysts came out with reasons that felt unsatisfactory. It isn’t a lack of quality, if you look at the reviews by the technology press of Windows’95, you’ll see a product that sucked in a way that made Vista look perfect by comparison; yet it went on to be the best-selling Microsoft product ever. Windows 8 has its problems, but in comparison to Vista its a really well made product. The fundamentally-flawed Windows 95 was the acme of Microsoft’s position in the marketplace. Given all this spurious debate, I thought I would throw some ideas out instead:

  • The economy – China now has single digit growth, economists generally agree that India isn’t living up to its economic potential. Brazil has problems, Europe is still going through the great restructure. The US is growing slowly but full of turmoil as government spending is causing uncertainty. All of these factors will affect purchases across IT and consumer electronics
  • The web – the biggest thing the web did was negate operating system specific file formats. You no longer need to write a document in Word or a spreadsheet in Excel. Enterprise applications no longer need to have a client piece of software running on a PC. This also means that you don’t need to follow software release cycles to keep your PC relevant. Given that the killer app for the PC is the web, replacement cycles for computers have lengthened. A friend of mine, recently had their iPad, iPhone 5 and PowerBook stolen in their house. Yes, that’s right I said PowerBook, their laptop which they were happy with was about seven years old…
  • Opportunity costs – So you have a computer that’s a few years old, but you are still happy with it and smartphones moving forwards more rapidly, so need to be replaced every 18 months to two years. The new PC purchase will get put on the back-burner
  • Substitute products – This is the classic butter-margarine example that economics teachers used to trot out before low-fat spreads caught the awareness of coronary wary consumers. But in a web-based world tablets that provide a PC like web experience are a substitute for a full-blooded personal computer. An iPad can run Myst, show video and communicate with others via the internet
  • A lack of a compelling reason to upgrade – Robert X. Cringely wrote his book Accidental Empires back in the early 1990s, had a whole chapter on the future of computing. One of the most striking parts of this chapter for me was a paragraph with a quote from Ken Okin who worked at Sun Microsystems at the time:  Ken Okin, who was in charge of hardware engineering for the Lisa and now heads the group designing Sun Microsystems’ newest workstations, keeps a Lisa in his office at Sun just to help his people put their work in perspective. “We still have a multitasking operating system with a graphical user interface and bit-mapped screen, but back then we did it with half a mip [one mip equals one million computer instructions per second] in 1 megabyte of RAM,” he said. “Today on my desk I have basically the same system, but this time I have 16 mips and an editor that doesn’t seem to run in anything less than 20 megabytes of RAM. It runs faster, sure, but what will it do that is different from the Lisa? It can do round windows; that’s all I can find that’s new. Round windows, great!”  So even back as far as the early 1990s there was a lack of a compelling reason to upgrade from machine-to-machine. This is even more of the case now. Cringely claimed that in order to have a radical jump in software appearance you would need a corresponding jump in the hardware. The last big jump that we had in personal computing was the tablet PDA
  • The declining power of the IT guy – between BYOD (bring your own device) and the rise of small or freelance businesses there are less traditional corporate users. The power of the Microsoft Certified system is diminished and with that decline has gone the ability to specify a Windows-based computer
  • The law of big numbers – Microsoft already has a huge installed user base, most sales will not be won from its competitors but from itself. That’s a tough place to be if people are looking for stellar growth
  • Paradigm shifts mean deskilling people – Metro represents a new way of using a computer. It threatens consumers current computer literacy knowledge. For many consumers there was no on-ramp
  • Divergence, convergence and the sitting room – a perfect storm of dedicated media server substitute products (Roku, Boxee, Apple TV), smart TVs, games consoles and tablets have squeezed the laptop, media PC and gaming machine in ‘lean back entertainment’ scenarios. We are seeing traditional brown goods being replaced by other goods (often providing a more convenient but poorer quality experience) in the living room that have also subverted multimedia computing

Does this all mean Microsoft is doomed? No.

Jason Goldberg on e-commerce

Jason is now known as the poster child e-commerce with Fab.com, in a prior role I had Jason as a client as he tried to transform recruiting in a similar way.

The video is on YouTube so may not be available to all readers.
Key points:

  • Globally, five percent of retail is now online
  • Move to e-commerce for emotional products is more about wow factor rather than price
  • Global love for great product design
  • Furniture, jewellery and art online have double and triple digit growth in sales
  • More than 50 per cent of Fab’s sales can be on mobile during a given day, aggregates out to 35-40 per cent overall
  • Consumers shop brands: product brands and retail brands. Expectation of online experience and product portfolio

Yahoo! back to 2005?

If you are vaguely interested in the online sector, you will have noticed that Summly has been acquired by Yahoo!. The acquisition is interesting for a number of reasons:

  • It is a statement of Yahoo!’s mobile aspirations. Yahoo! has been in mobile for a good while. Yahoo! Go tried to pull all the of the Yahoo! portal properties into an app-like experience and Yahoo! ZoneTag was an early experiment of attributing location to smartphone pictures well before the iPhone. Upload to Flickr was integrated into many SonyEricsson and Nokia phones (notably the bestselling Nokia N73) But none of these pioneering efforts were rewarded with market share
  • Yahoo! is looking to buy cool. Summly has had about one million downloads, mostly by early adopters of its news reader. It is not the mass-market audience that Yahoo! usually targets, like Flickr and Delicious before it this is about cool. Whilst most of the focus has been on the media, Yahoo! has historically made these purchases to try and infuse some of the start-up get up and go DNA into the larger organisation
  • Summly makes some interesting technological choices that would appeal to Yahoo!. Firstly, surfacing content that consumers would find of interest; particularly interesting given that Google has abandoned RSS. Secondly, using analytical techniques to create abridged version of content could also be a differentiator in search in terms of both presentation and as a technique to improve relevance (if the abridged rather than full versions were indexed)
  • The 3o million dollar acquisition figure being bandied around mirrors the rumoured costs of buying both Flickr and Delicious back in the mid-noughties. One of the key differences between Flickr and Delicious with Summly is the technology benefit that was brought to the table by the web 2.0 pioneers and in Flickr’s case the quality of the business on offer. Prior to being acquired Flickr was pretty close to breaking even with its freemium model
  • Summly is an interesting focus away from the traditional Silicon  and Bay Area stomping grounds of Yahoo!

More information
Yahoo! to acquire Summly | Yodel Anecdotal

Mobile operators and customer loyalty

WDS released this report on the first day of Mobile World Congress and it makes depressing reading for UK mobile operators.
WDS-Loyalty-Audit-UK
The consumers who are sticking with their operator are likely to be resigned to their operator and consider the competitors to be of the same standard. The aggregate NetPromoter index is just 5%, whilst not as bad as financial services it isn’t great.

It means that a lot of the effort put in by the carriers to give their customers priority access to concerts, cinema tickets or back-up their address books are pretty much for naught.

The low trust levels also have implications for services like m-payments.

More information
2013 WDS Customer Loyalty Audit

The great restructure

Since the financial crisis first broke in the UK we’ve seen the demise of a number of high street brands. The recession has been a catalyst for restructure with the retail sector.

There have been a number of factors at work:

Online retail disrupting offline business models – Brands from Blockbuster to HMV have been disrupted by the immediacy of digital media and in the case of HMV a withdrawal of catering to local needs in the bricks-and-mortar stores. Record groups like Rough Trade and independent shops show that there is a demand for media artifacts – but not a sufficiently large one to support large corporations. Other sector beyond media such as clothes and brown goods have also suffered from online competition notably DSG and Comet.

Changing demographics – from Mrs Thatcher’s we are all middle-class to a shrinking middle-class seen across the developed world. Outside of London; city central districts are changing. I have noticed the difference during my trips back to Liverpool, first we saw a consolidation of department store brands, then the disappearance of many mid-market brands.

What is also interesting is how traditional value-orientated brands like Woolworths, Ethel Austin and Littlewoods fared. Their competition was not only discount stores like Primark, but informal sellers on eBay as well. So they went under.

Now this process is being exasperated by the UK banking system woes, but this only accelerating what would have happened over a longer period otherwise.

More information
HMV to sell famous Oxford Street store | The Guardian
UK malls use Google in desperate stab at luring shoppers off the web • The Register
Blockbuster goes into administration – Brand Republic News
Surprise UK retail sales drop fuels triple-dip recession fears | guardian.co.uk
HMV and Republic: are administrators ruining the value of websites? | Econsultancy
Who’s Gone Bust in January 2013 – Centre for Retail Research, Nottingham UK

Jargon watch: black business

In the west, corporate and social responsiblity has been on the minds of management teams for a while. It is also starting to get traction in Asian companies that are exposed to international markets. It doesn’t seem to trouble some Japanese companies however.

A black business is described as a company that overworks its employees, harasses them, and/or pays significantly low wages for the work provided.

Charges against black businesses include death by overwork.

More information
Could Japan’s Latest Buzz Word Get You Sued? Lawyer Weighs In | Rocket News 24

Power and the mobile eco-system

Over the past few months I have been reading a lot about the smartphone market and have been thinking about power relationships.

When one thinks about smartphones and similar devices it is usually divided up by critics into Google, Apple, and possibly Microsoft. In reality Samsung has dominated the Android segment of the market in many countries.

Thinking about this recently, this is more complex than the HP or Dell analogue in the PC market as there isn’t a carrier relationship in the PC market and the channel structures are different. This negates somewhat the power that the OS developer and the microprocessor manufacturer had in the market. The scale of the manufacturer provides advantages on distribution, ability to localise the handsets and marketing spend.

Apple would be slightly different by supporting a very narrow product set at higher margins instead, but having the same effect.

So I am currently trying wrap my head around whether operators need to worry more about Samsung or Google. Samsung seem to think that the power lies more with the handset manufacturer once they get to a certain scale as their Bada and Tizen operating system platforms provide an alternative to the Android operating system. Google’s take would be harder to discern due to the fact that it has to be seen to be keeping a number of hardware partners on side.

All of this matters as it would provide a better insight as to whether the Finnish start-up Jolla and it’s Sailfish project stands a reasonable chance of success. Jolla’s work is exciting as it offers a picture of where Nokia could have taken its Meego operating system before it got Elop-ed.

By the way before you forget it is unlucky to leave your Christmas decorations up beyond tonight.

More information
Sailfish operating system
Jolla

British Airways Avios: rewards or lottery?

I have over 106,00o Avios, enough to get me from Heathrow to Hong Kong first-class and still have some left over. These are frequent flyer points given out by British Airways. I have a lot of them and wanted to spend them. Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to cash them in the four times or so that I have tried. In fact I wasn’t able to book a Heathrow to Hong Kong flight in any class of travel. I admit,   I was more than a little disappointed. But my curiosity was bigger than my disappointment and so my last failed Avios experience got me thinking.

In fact when I went forward a month or so I still couldn’t get a Heathrow to Hong Kong flight, apart from one flight which required a stopover in Riydah, Saudi Arabia. The Riydah stopover isn’t really an option at all, unless one is:

  • A Saudi national
  • Part of the tour group (of four or more) with a Saudi visitors visa
  • In possession of a Saudi business visa, which requires an invitation from a Saudi company
  • In possession of a Saudi employment visa

If you don’t fit into any of those categories, you aren’t allowed to transit through a Saudi airport, this would include the lions share of the BA customer base.  In other words, I had two hopes: Bob Hope and no hope.

So I did an unscientific survey amongst my contacts and found that they’d managed to spend their Avios (and their predecessor Air Miles)  on trans-Atlantic flights occasionally, but mostly for short-haul European flights.  They like me had found it hard to book longer haul flights.

This time I tried going through customer services who checked and told me that there were no reward flights available when I wanted to go. I enquired via the British Airways Twitter account about trading options and they said how would one put a monetary value on Avios?

So bear with me whilst  I break this down:

There are a limited number of rewards seats, how many on the journey I want to go? I don’t know. Where they go or when they are, apart from searching via the British Airways site. It isn’t exactly a transparent process, what proportion of seats could notionally qualify? This sounds to me like the start of a game of chance, rather than the traditional rewards scheme like my local coffee shop, Superdrug or Boots cards.

Why are there a limited number of seats? Presumably to reduce the redemption rate down to an ‘acceptable’ level. Given that Avios are earned in proportion to transactions:

  • Airline flights
  • Promotional partner purchases
  • Credit card transactions

This implies that there is some form of monetary value exchange by the affiliate marketing parter, there is some from of monetary value to British Airways and by implication there is some form of monetary value (after BA has taken it’s cut) to the consumer (me).

So how do we derive a value? I suspected it is likely to vary according to route. Here are some examples based on single flights from London (all airports) on December 1, 2012, versus how many Avios the trip requires. I have taken out taxes from the flight price to make the comparison between the payment methods fair. I have also not included the credit card surcharge and picked the cheapest flight shown. All data has been provided from the British Airways website with a currency setting in pounds:

Destination | class Avios Price in pounds Avios/Pound
Hong Kong (1st) 91,000 7,312.01 12.4453
Hong Kong (business) 60,000 4,709.01 12.7416
New York (1st) 60,000 6,822.71 8.7942
New York (business) 40,000 4,199.71 9.5245
Dubai (1st) 60,000 3,627.01 16.5426
Dubai (business) 40,000 2,755.01 14.5190
Helsinki (1st) 22,500 439.95** 51.1422
Helsinki (business) 15,000 439.95 34.0948
Manchester (business) 4,500 2.60* 1,730.7692

*  Avios lists a business class option to Manchester, the ticket booking system only offers economy. The price is minus the airport tax.

** Avios lists a first-class option to Helsinki, the ticket booking system only offers business and economy class

So this is a very small sample size, but there seems to be some sort of pricing strategy at work, which implies that British Airways has some sort of notional value on the Avio as a currency unit and they are trying to elicit customer behavioural change and maximise the Avios/pounds price that they get for flights.

I presume that they would probably move around reward seats to use Avios iron out gaps in demand. But given that Avios price can alter, why does British Airways need to also restrict demand with ‘reward seats’ availability?

Given this research there are a number of attributes that I think would go into deriving a the notional value of an Avios if it was to be traded:

  • Where I want to go and when I want to go which dictate a probability of getting hold of a reward seat
  • How long the Avios are needed for. If you want to fly next week, it doesn’t matter whether the Avios you are buying the flight run out in a month or four years time. If you are buying Avios to use in 12 months their expiry date matters more

Some of these attributes start to make Avios look like a derivative, so an algorithm similar to the Black-Scholes equation would factor in:

  • The risk that you wouldn’t be able to spend the Avios
  • The notional value of the Avios based on where market players actually want to go to rather than where British Airways wants to game their flight plans to go

In a market like Points.com, were Avios to be floated as currency or against other rewards programmes, one maybe able to see their true value. A massive deflation in their value would support my hypothesis of Avios not being rewards per se, but more analogous to a lottery ticket.

And such a situation would be counterproductive to customer  loyalty, because the gamed nature of the programme would become more readily apparent. Imagine if you were told you can enter a game of maybe getting on some flights for free (excluding airport taxes), but more points doesn’t necessarily increase your chances of winning. British Airways Avios customer loyalty scheme wouldn’t seem so attractive, would it?

I’d leave the final words to John Lydon:

Ever get the feeling you’ve been cheated? Good night!

which he apparently said at the end of the last Sex Pistols concert, Winterland Theater, San Francisco, California January 14, 1978.

 

Jeremah Owyang on scaling social media marketing | business activities

Not new to those of use that follow Jeremiah Owyang, but the problem of scaling within a social business context is one that he keeps coming back to. Here is the slides that he shared at Dreamforce – a Salesforce.com event.

The slides are on Slideshare so may not be visible to all readers.

I like: Mizuno Osaka Marathon running shoes

I came across these special edition Osaka Marathon running shoes that were designed to celebrate their involvement with the 2011 Osaka marathon. They are an amazing colour-way. However Mizuno are missing a trick in terms of both distribution and addressing the sneaker-head market.
Mizuno Osaka marathon kicks
Mizuno is proud brand that could go toe-to-toe with New Balance, adidas or even Nike if it looked at its archive and designs like this shoe.

Chinese brands won’t scale?

I have been reading an interesting book at the moment Tom Doctorow’s What Chinese Want: Culture, Communism and the Modern Chinese Consumer based on his experience working with J Walter Thompson in China. There is a lot of really great stuff here, one thing struck me as odd, Doctorow under-estimates Chinese businesses in their quest to extend their brands overseas.
L1000816
Lenovo managed to go global through it’s acquisition of IBM’s PC business; which is now challenging HP and Dell in the PC market. But Lenovo has cloaked it’s Chinese nature with a name that only a branding consultant could truly love.
Tsingtao-DragonMasters_A2PortraitBarPoster
Tsing Tao (said Ching Dow) beer makes no excuses and embraces its Chinese heritage from a ping pong ball breathing dragon in bars to posters welcoming the Chinese olympic team to their camp in Leeds.
Welcoem to leeds[1]
With brands like Tiger, Cobra, Sapparo and Kirin before it who says Tsing Tao couldn’t make a truly Chinese brand go global.

Images by Mojofuel via McCann Erickson Manchester.

Conflicted on the Wikipedia draft best practice guidelines for PR

Over the past couple of months following a high profile exposé of Bell Pottinger editing Wikipedia pages, there has been a desire in the PR industry to understand the service better and add it to it’s toolbox. In some respects this mirrors how the web has moved on from pioneers to the pedestrian.

As a communications professional I recognise that Wikipedia (like a lot of media coverage) often portrays clients in an unflattering light and can contain inaccuracies in commentary. The big challenge for communicators is that unlike newspapers that may have national reach as ‘paper of record’; Wikipedia has a global reach and a similar status for many audiences. The site is referenced in parliaments and courts, so is immensely powerful.

As a communications professional I can also understand the pressure to meddle and distort to bring content ‘on message’ by clients and have concerns about the less scrupulous or plain ignorant who would abuse everything that Wikipedia stands for.

As a consumer, I don’t want public relations anywhere near Wikipedia, any more than I would want the industry to be rewriting the Encyclopedia Britannica, exploiting education syllabuses or writing legislation.

Quotes from the discussions around this:

Given that Lord Bell said explicitly and publicly after being shown his employees editing Wikipedia in completely egregious ways (lying about their identity, sock puppeting, etc.) that he thought that they did absolutely nothing wrong, it is ludicrous to treat him with such respect. The entire document is a joke – a PR operatives fantasy of what the community might accept. Nowhere does it put forward what is the most important best practice of all: don’t edit Wikipedia article space directly except in emergency situations. Without that, I will fight this with every resource at my disposal. It’s disgusting and immoral.–Jimbo Wales (talk) 21:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Best practice PR seeks to build mutual understanding and goodwill (ie, not the ‘spin’ definition). So on that basis, I’m afraid as long as Wikipedia remains a community and media through which understanding goes around comes around, you’re stuck with the constant attention of the PR profession. — Phil Sheldrake 22:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

More information
Draft best practice guidelines for PR | Wikimedia UK

Trendwatching on Better Made In China

Trendwatching.com put together an interesting presentation on how Chinese consumption, manufacturing, domestic brands and marketing are evolving to provide better products for a more discerning Chinese consumer. This vibrant industry at the moment is invigorating Chinese consumer demand; but is likely to grow into international demand soon. From Tencent Weixin to BYD electric cars.

The presentation is on Slideshare which may not be available to all readers.