Search results for: “Apple”

  • Apple’s MacBook Pro at 20.

    Apple’s MacBook Pro turned 20 this year. Steve Jobs introduced the move to Intel processors that made the original Apple MacBook Pro possible at WWDC 2005. The reason revolved around computing power per watt. PowerPC’s offered 15 units of performance per watt, Intel’s future roadmap at the time offered 70 units of performance per watt.

    This impacted energy efficiency and heat management as much of raw processing power – both of which were important for portable devices and smaller desktop units. Those metrics were a symptom of IBM’s inability to push the PowerPC architecture and fabrication processes as far as Intel could. Here’s Steve Jobs’ from his keynote address:

    Because we want to make the best computers for our customers looking forward. Now, I stood up here two years ago in front of you and I promised you [a 3 GHz Power Macintosh G5], and we haven’t been able to deliver that to you yet. I think a lot of you would like a G5 in your PowerBook and we haven’t been able to deliver that to you yet. But these aren’t even the most important reasons. The most important reasons are that as we look ahead, though we may have great products right now, and we’ve got some great PowerPC product[s] still yet to come, as we look ahead we can envision some amazing products we want to build for you and we don’t know how to build them with the future PowerPC road map. And that’s why we’re going to do this. When we look at Intel, they’ve got great performance, yes, but they’ve got something else that’s very important to us. Just as important as performance, is power consumption. And the way we look at it is performance per watt. For one watt of power how much performance do you get? And when we look at the future road maps projected out in mid-2006 and beyond, what we see is the PowerPC gives us sort of 15 units of performance per watt, but the Intel road map in the future gives us 70, and so this tells us what we have to do.

    My journey with Apple’s MacBook Pro.

    I was leaving Yahoo! to go to an agency then called Waggener Edstrom, bringing my experience working on digital campaigns and using blogs as a product communications channel. My redundancy cheque was in my bank account and my Mac Mini was of limited use due to it being a desktop computer.

    Mac6

    Based on what I had seen the previous year and conversations I had with Yahoo! engineers there was only one laptop for me to get: the Apple MacBook Pro.

    The Apple MacBook Pro represented a step change in what you could do. You were longer tethered by your power cord to your machine. At Yahoo! we had a bad cultural habit of using our laptops in meetings, not only for presenting, but to retrieve relevant files, take notes and have sideline conversations on Yahoo! Messenger that may have been apropos to the meeting going on, or organising what to have for lunch.

    While you could access Yahoo! Messenger on your phone, it was much slower and less user friendly than iMessage, Signal or WhatsApp would be now.

    If you had two meetings back-to-back there was a dash back to your desk to plug into your charger. Going to a conference meant a scramble for those seats next to a power socket.

    The MagSafe connector meant that your laptop would no longer get dragged onto the floor by the power cable if someone brushed past your table. Instead it would be secured magnetically and easily disconnected.

    If your Apple MacBook Pro was plummeting to the floor, an accelerometer onboard would at least park the hard drive heads to minimise any damage on landing. It wasn’t fool proof but it was step out on options previously available.

    On the Apple MacBook Pro, the laptop lid closed and stayed in place, once Apple moved way from using the last generation PowerBook design case. Many Windows laptops had to have their screens locked with a latch or a button, a number still do. Previous PowerBooks were only slight more elegant with a flush mechanical push-button placed on the front edge of the lower case. Pressing it pushed a small internal bar that unhooked a latch extending down from the display bezel.

    In a darkened room the keyboard would light up. This was a game changer when you were watching a projected presentation, or in my case, going through emails while watching CSI DVD boxsets of an evening.

    Apple’s MacBook Pro was a game changer for me. I didn’t need to work at my desk. I could work in a local coffee shop, or a different part of the office without bringing my power pack.

    Apple’s MacBook Pro radically changed working from home. You no longer had to worry about a separate webcam perching precariously on the top of your screen. Instead, the MacBook Pro had it built into the top of the laptop screen. Giving you an integrated video studio that we now take for granted but was revolutionary when it was launched.

    An aside on laptop cameras

    So IBM made the first laptop with an integrated laptop with a webcam back in 1996 called the ThinkPad 850 which was a PowerPC workstation in a laptop format.

    There was also the Sony VAIO PCG-C1 PictureBook which was a Windows sub notebook that had a camera which could be rotated to look towards the user or in front of the laptop lid. Both were very expensive for the time and saw limited usage. The MD in my first agency had a PCG-C1 and it was a beautiful piece of industrial design for the time.

    DSC00161

    It’s the kind of laptop that would have looked right at home in Ghost In The Shell. Neither of them models could be considered to mainstream products. But the Apple MacBook Pro brought the built-in camera into the mainstream of laptop design.

    Remote working.

    Skype was only a few years old at this point, allowing for video calls with clients, distributed teams and remote working. With a MacBook Pro, you had it all together in a seamless package. Twenty years ago we were pretty close to what became the new normal during COVID and in the post-COVID work world.

    Battery life

    Early on in my agency career, a lot of my clients had Tumi leather bags. The Tumi Alpha bag became a corporate rite-of-passage. You were a corporate traveller. Tumi had benefits for air travellers, being soft enough to squeeze into an overseas bin, but tough enough to protect the contents and not burst at the seams while you waited at the checked baggage carousel.

    Beyond the social signalling Tumi bags became useful as a repository for spare batteries and a charging block with cable. There was probably a note pad and some pens in there as well, along with travel documents.

    That’s what a work day outside the office needed. One of the pleasures of people watching in an airline lounge at the time was watching the passive aggressive conflict over a limited amount of electric sockets available.

    The Apple MacBook Pro started off with a solid 4 1/2 hours of battery life making it ideal if you went to a conference like I ended up doing at the time. Or you could take it along to a pitch, present and head back to the office without your power brick. Things changed when Apple introduced the unibody model. You could no longer swap out a spare battery. Apple eventually compromised with a low price battery replacement for aged out batteries. This also meant that Apple pivoted to a full working day on batteries – a game changer in laptop computing.

    The move to ARM-based Apple silicon

    In the same way that Steve Jobs announced the move to Intel in 2005, that reasoning was mirrored in the 2020 move to ARM-based Apple silicon focus on performance per watt, which made the MacBook Pro even more ‘road warrior’ friendly.

    ARM also offered other opportunities

    • Custom silicon including on-silicon neural networks and security enclaves.
    • Common architectures with iPads, iPhones and the AppleTV.
    • Control over its own silicon roadmap, rather than being tied to Intel’s chip-making process delays.

    What’s also changed over the 15 years of the MacBook Pro is their ubquity. In coffee shops like the ones near my home, the few people that seem to use non-Apple laptops are usually mainland Chinese students. And their laptops borrow a lot design cues from the MacBook Pro.

    More information

    Macworld Podcast: The history and future of the MacBook | Macworld

    More related posts here.

  • Apple development + more things

    Apple development

    Apple development changes was at the forefront of Apple’s WWDC keynote for 2025. I think that the focus on Apple development changes were happening for a few reasons:

    • Apple got burned announcing sub-standard AI offerings last year.
    • The new translucent interface is divisive.
    • The multi-tasking iPad was interesting for power users, but most usage is as a communal device to consume content.
    • Apple has a number of small on-device models that do particular things well. Which is why Apple needs to get developers on-board to come up with compelling uses.
    • The Mac still has great hardware, passionate developers and a community passionate about great life-changing software. Apple development focus was coming home.

    Apple Updates Its On-Device and Cloud AI Models, Introduces a New Developer API

    China

    The Next Labubu: What the Rise of Wakuku Tells Us About China’s Collectible Toy Wave | What’s on Weibo

    Chinese cities are facing the financial abyss of their subway systems | Le Monde

    Consumer behaviour

    The gray wave: How an aging population is reshaping the economy | Mizuho Insights

    College Students Are Using ‘No Contact Orders’ to Block Each Other in Real Life – WSJ

    Culture

    ChatGPT has changed how we speak – and how we think | TechFinitive

    The working class always had ‘high’ culture – it was just stolen | The Independent

    Energy

    Rolls-Royce group wins government backing to build UK’s first small modular nuclear reactors | FT

    Ethics

    ‘Positive review only’: Researchers hide AI prompts in papers – Nikkei Asia

    Beyond Cannes – by Hamish McKenzie – The Substack Post

    UNIQLO ‘Cai fan’ keychain kerfuffle: Where does inspiration end and imitation begin? | Marketing-Interactive

    FMCG

    Unilever acquires Dr. Squatch to expand men’s care portfolio | Personal Care Insights – the irony of this purchase given Dr Squatch’s positioning isn’t lost on me

    Health

    New Novo Nordisk drug could beat market leaders for weight loss, early results show | FT

    Hong Kong

    How my views on Hong Kong’s future have evolved | Stephen Roach

    Luxury

    Why luxury brands are sliding into the DMs | Vogue Business

    Media

    European broadcasters launch radio initiative to capture connected car opportunity – The Media Leader

    Online

    Creative Commons 4.0 has arrived on Flickr! | Flickr Blog

    Security

    Ingram Micro still silent 14 hours after global outage began • The Register

    The Cyber Risks Behind The Iran-Israel-US Geopolitical Tensions | Forrester

    UK govt says Chinese spying on the rise | Space War – so why did the UK sign off on the Chinese mega-embassy?

    Taiwan

    Digital Propaganda: How China Uses Short-Form Videos to Target Taiwan’s Youth | Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University

    Technology

    Samsung delays $44 billion Texas chip fab — sources say completion halted because ‘there are no customers’ | Tom’s Hardware

    Thailand

    One Eye on Asia: Pathida Akkarajindanon – ‘Thai ads can hit you harder than you expect’ | Branding in Asia

    ‘Blood Connect’ – Inspiring Gen Z in Thailand to Value Blood Donation | Branding in Asia

  • Apple Intelligence delayed + more

    Apple Intelligence delayed.

    Apple announced that features showcased during the 2024 WWDC enhancing Siri would be delayed. Apple Intelligence delayed represents a serious breach of trust for Apple’s early adopters and the developer community. On its own whilst that’s rare from Apple, it’s survivable.

    DSC_0125

    Apple has made other FUBARs: the Newton, some of the Performa model Macintosh computers in the 1990s, the Apple Pippin, Apple QuickTake cameras and the Apple Cube computer from 2000.

    The most recent game-changing product has been the AirPod series of headphones which have become ubiquitous on the tube and client video calls. But there has been a definite vibe shift around perceptions at Apple.

    • Recent product upgrades to the MacBook Air were given a muted welcome. Personally I think Apple came out with a banger of a product: the M4 processor in the MacBook Air M1 form-factor at the Intel MacBook Air price of $999.
    • The Vision Pro goggles are at best a spoiler on the high-end market for Meta’s VR efforts, and an interesting experiment once lens technology catches up with their concept. At worst they are a vanity project for Tim Cook that have a very limited audience.
    • Conceptually Apple Intelligence told a deceptively good story. Let others develop the underlying LLMs that would power Apple Intelligence. This solution is partially forced on Apple due to the mutually exclusive needs between China and its other markets. But it also meant that Apple had a smaller AI challenge than other vendors. On-device intelligence that would work out the best way to solve a problem and handle easier problems without the latency of consulting a cloud service. More complex problems would then be doled out to off-device services with privacy being a key consideration. The reality is that Apple Intelligence delayed until 2027 because of technical challenges.

    Key commentary on the Apple Intelligence delay:

    Chungking Express.

    One of my most loved films is Chungking Express directed by Wong Ka wai. It was one of the reasons that I decided to take up the opportunity to live and work in Hong Kong. This YouTube documentary cuts together some of the oral history about the making of the film. The story of the production is nuts.

    Drone deliveries

    Interesting documentary by Marques Brownlee on the limited use cases and massive leaps in innovation going into drone delivery systems.

    Effective Marketing for Financial Services

    Les Binet presents a financial services-specific view on marketing effectiveness. It has some interesting nuances, in particular how brand building is MORE important in subscription services.

    Tony Touch set

    Tony Touch did a set for Aimé Leon Dore. It’s an impeccably programmed set.

    LUCID Air focus on efficiency

    It’s rare to hear the spokesperson for an American car company quoting Colin Chapman’s design philosophy – which he shared with Norman Foster.

  • Apple Watch Ultra 2

    I was fortunate to get an Apple Watch Ultra 2. It is the third Apple Watch that I have owned and the sixth wearable. My previous history in wearables were:

    A Yamasa Tokei analogue pedometer (I received it around the time I was in primary school. It came in handy for guesstimating walking distances when I was in the scouts). What I didn’t know at the time is that the 1960s-era interest in pedometers that eventually spawned my device was driven by Japanese interest in combating obesity due to modernisation during the post-war economic miracle.

    If you are focusing on your 10,000 steps a day you can thank Dr Yoshiro Hatano and manufacturers like Yamasa who eventually sold their ‘Manpo-kei’ (10,000 step measure) in the west as ‘Manpo-meter’ devices from the 1960s through to the late 1990s.

    Nike Fuelband – I really enjoyed the simplicity of this device, but it was very fragile and I ended up going through three devices in a matter of months.

    https://flic.kr/p/ijmdqT

    Casio G-Shock+ connected device that was let down by its software, but very much a go-anywhere device.

    blue G-shock

    Polar Loop fitness tracker – it was more reliable than Nike’s Fuelband but I didn’t really enjoy it as device.

    https://flic.kr/p/oRaxEt

    Apple Watch series 1 and 2 – I lasted about 48 hours wearing the series 1 Apple Watch, but did better with a series 2 device.

    apple watch series one

    Apple Watch Ultra 2

    278A8724

    My expectations have been impacted by poor experiences with earlier devices.

    How have I found the Apple Watch Ultra 2?

    I have worn tool watches all my adult life, a mix of mechanical dive watches and Casio G-Shocks. That meant that I didn’t think about where I took my watches. Into the shower, or the swimming pool – the watches could take it all in their stride. But the Apple Watch couldn’t.

    The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is a classic ‘go anywhere’ watch. It is waterproof like a Casio G-Shock. So fine for swimming, in the shower or scuba diving. Titanium means that it’s hypoallergenic, and corrosion resistant; even more so than most grades of stainless steel. However, if you wear it in the sea or at the swimming pool, rinse the watch in clean fresh water afterwards, like you should do with any other dive watch.

    I found the default straps sold with the Apple Watch Ultra 2 were excessively clunky. Awkward to wear and got snagged in random situations. Instead I favoured a Nike Sports silicone band which is ideal for the gym or working in the office.

    I bought a cheap clear bumper for the Apple Watch Ultra 2. It keeps fingerprints off the screen and gives items like the buttons and digital crown a modicum of protection from being activated by putting on a jacket as we go into a cooler wetter autumn.

    Battery life on it seems to be more generous than the older Apple Watch models I have used and based on what I have seen I think you could get a weekend out of it without a charge.

    The ubiquity of Apple watches on the wrists of Londoners mean that this doesn’t attract any good or bad attention.

    What’s it like?

    Compared to previous Apple watch models I have used the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is faster and more sophisticated. I get the sense that the Apple WatchOS is now supported by less non-health related apps than previously. My watch supports alerts for my train ticket bookings, airline flights and my preferred taxi app.

    Part of this might be down to watch might make contextual sense in the 10 second app usage time that a consumer would have. And when does it make sense to just pull the phone out of your pocket.

    There isn’t the same lag that made the first series Apple Watch unusable, as the device has become more powerful and more processing happens on the watch. Apple’s health app is more tracking than I need, so I haven’t used it with apps like Strava.

    What’s good about it?

    All of the Apple watch models have been impressive pieces of engineering and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is no exception. In their own way, they challenge Swiss industry for a different type of engineering prowess.

    I really like the strap that I landed on. The material is the right texture and unlike other straps I have worn it doesn’t hinder my typing on a laptop. That being said the strap owes a lot to Marc Newson’s prior work in the early 1990s for Ikepod. This all means that you have a device that feels nice on the wrist.

    One of the first things that I liked about the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is ‘night mode’ a plain red on black face, rather than the distracting colour complications. It would be great if this could be a universal theme carried through all the watch faces.

    Thanks to mobile phone contracts, Apple watches like G-Shocks are surprisingly poor signals of status. In a city like London, that has its benefits.

    What could be improved?

    The Apple Watch is over nine years old. A number of problems have been there since the first device launch and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is merely the latest in the line to carry them.

    You can’t wear your watch on the inside of your wrist. I used to scuba dive without a dive computer, relying on pre-planned dive tables, a depth gauge and air pressure gauge for my tank. I got into the habit of wearing my watch on the inside of my right wrist so I could hold my gauge console in my hand and see my elapsed dive time at the same time. It also means that your watch is less on-show in public settings.

    Screens default to being overly busy with Apple trying to cram in as many complications as possible which compromises ‘glanceability’ – the key experience benefit that wearables like the Apple Watch Ultra 2 provide. Apple should also start to think about accessibility on across the Apple Watch range as much as it does on a Mac. I have have worked bleary eyed from deep sleep, looked at the watch and not being able to read it until my focus kicks in. How could the haptics function in the Apple Watch be used better?

    Less apps now support the Apple Watch than have done previously. The more apps that support a platform, the more likely you are to get at least some sticky experiences that add to the utility of the device.

    It’s not a particularly stylish device to look at, but it also doesn’t lean into function in the same way that a Casio G-Shock does. This means that it could be better protected out of the box than it is.

    The battery life is better than previous generations of Apple Watch, but it still creates battery anxiety. Unlike Casio or other manufacturers, there’s no solar top-up option.

    I don’t know how precise the data is. It measures blood oxygen level but freely admits its data isn’t good enough to be used in a medical situation. If you move to an Apple device from a Garmin or similar, you may find that your step count and activity measures may vary.

    Price-wise, it’s expensive. It does offer value for what it does, but it’s expensive. You can spend as much, if not more money on a G-Shock than an Apple Watch Ultra 2; but the G-Shock won’t be a worry on issues like obsolescence, software support or even battery replacement in the same way that the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is. I have G-Shocks that I have owned for almost 20 years and are perfectly fine. I won’t be able to say the same of any Apple Watch.

    What’s its use?

    Still a great question. When I had my first Apple Watch, I stopped using it after 48 hours for a few reasons:

    • I couldn’t see a good user case coming thorough in the product at the time
    • It was slow
    • It had poor battery life

    At the time Apple had thrown a number of things at the wall. There was a luxury line with a $17,000 version with a gold case and official third-party leather straps by Hermès. Apple still sells a Hermès co-branded range, but the gold models are no longer made.

    In the intervening years Apple has committed to a number of areas:

    • An extension of your phone, on your wrist.
    • Integration with payments
    • Integration with identity
    • The quantified self

    The use cases I have personally favoured included being an extension of my phone, when it rings my watch vibrates. But since I work most of the time at home and the phone sits on a stand in front of me, this tends to be only useful when I am out. Glanceable updates from a few apps, notably weather and my taxi app.

    The Apple Watch Ultra 2 can work as a standalone phone attached to your existing number, but that depends on your mobile carrier supporting it. I didn’t opt for this for reasons relating to my current service plan with 3 UK.

    Tracking activity and the quality of my sleep. The quantified self is the area where Apple really pushes now, as do third-party developers such as Strava.

    Apple also allows integration with Apple wallet, but you have to turn your wrist in an awkward position to work with most ‘tap-and-go’ systems. It is just as easy to do it with your phone or card.

    Finally, Apple and some car manufacturers have been looking at using Apple devices as your car key. I live in London and even if I did need a car, I would be going for a pre-owned vehicle.

    Is it a watch?

    Is the Apple Watch Ultra 2 actually a watch at first glance seems like a ridiculous proposition, if for no other reason than you have the word ‘watch’ twice in close succession.

    But on closer examination, it’s a pertinent question. Watch sales actually dropped as cellphones became ubiquitous. You had the time in your pocket or purse and the phone went everywhere with you. If you went abroad on holiday, it even changed time zones unless you specifically set it not to do so.

    Watches offered some benefits from using the cellphone as a portable clock.

    • Easy to read / glanceable.
    • An analogue face allowed you to visually understand elapsed time.
    • It sent social signals in work about taking time seriously and likely punctuality.
    • More broadly the watch demonstrates signals about style, wealth, taste and even sub-cultures. This can be especially true of luxury brands and the countless collaborations that Casio has done with its G-Shock range over the years.
    • Finally, if you have an automatic movement watch or a solar powered quartz one, you don’t need to worry about a dead cellphone battery.

    Smartwatches in general, have put a simplified version of your smartphone on your wrist. Depending who your mobile service provider is, your Apple Watch Ultra 2 can become a fallback phone, allowing you to leave it charging at home.

    But as a watch it’s trying to do too many other things. Update you on your messages, provide a simplified experience of some apps (airlines and taxi services in particular) and activity tracking. All of which is squeezed into a screen area about an eighth the size of my smartphone’s screen.

    This all comes with experience choices and compromises. It’s this lack of functional purity that is a moat between even the most technical G-Shock and an Apple Watch Ultra 2. Your watch will never compromise on telling you the time despite being a really shitty dive recorder or digital compass.

    Yes you can spend the price of a Porsche; on a Patek Philippe watch with lots of complications, but realistically it’s an objet d’art that happens to look like a wrist watch. On that measure the Apple Watch Ultra 2 isn’t a watch, despite sitting on your wrist.

    More information

    On smart watches, I’ve decided to take the plunge | renaissance chambara

    Wearable devices | renaissance chambara

    Living with the Apple Watch | renaissance chambara

  • Wonderlust Apple event

    The Apple Wonderlust event happened on September 12, 2023. The events timing fitted in with the two Apple events a year that we have grown to expect:

    • Worldwide Developers Conference – in June.
    • Autumn event in September / October.

    Unlike when I started buying Apple products these events are no longer hosted at external conference centres but at Apple’s own conference centre as part of its campus. For the past decade and a half Apple hasn’t participated at wider trade shows, in the same way that the likes of Samsung or Microsoft would at CES.

    https://flic.kr/p/2p3MDKc
    Apple Inc.

    Apple events from the late 1990s onwards built their reputation for being great live performances by Steve Jobs and the management team. COVID-19 seems to have allowed Apple to move to a pre-recorded keynote that the media and general public watch together either in person or streamed online, followed by the media being allowed to get hands on with the products.

    This allows for a polished event presentation, all-be-it one that might be out of touch with its audience. More on that later.

    Is wonderlust even a word?

    A quick look at dictionaries offline and online kept bringing up results for wonderlust – the hankering to travel. That was until I hit Urban Dictionary that categorised wonderlust this way:

    the desire to be in a constant state of wonder
    Joe had a serious case of wonderlust: he was bored of anything ordinary.

    There were other definitions, but I think that they were outside the scope of where Apple wanted to go.

    TL;DR

    If you’ve bought an Apple product in the past three years there weren’t any ‘must buy’ products showcased in the Wonderlust event. Your iPhone and Apple Watch will still be good enough and benefit from this years upgraded OS. If you have a device over three years old then upgrading to the new products is worth considering.

    Apple still hasn’t jumped on the folding screen bandwagon that Samsung has. Given that we don’t see question-and-answer sessions that Steve Jobs sometimes indulged us with we don’t know the definitive ‘why’ yet.

    The meh moments

    There was more to criticise in this Apple events than other recent ones.

    USB-C as a benefit

    The reality is that in order for Apple to sell in the European Union it has had to move the iPhone and AirPods to a USB-C connection, away from the the Lightning connector. Apple tried to play this off as an improvement that they’d made to their phones, but the reality is that it was a change forced upon Apple.

    Cringeworthy ESG update

    Part of the pre-recorded content was a skit where Mother Nature turns up at Apple HQ for a meeting with the team about improvements in their environmental record. The problem was that the film was out of touch with the audience and has been roundly criticised.

    https://youtu.be/QNv9PRDIhes?si=ePi4KhIG4TWqCWYq

    For five minutes, we had the same thing over and over. It might be about materials one moment and packaging the next, but it was a single gag stretched out too far.

    It was stretched so thin that you could see the thinking behind it. Every single element was good by itself, and no one would cut anything. 

    But the result is that every single element was undermined by the repetition. And instead of Apple showing it was better than just sell-sell-sell videos, the result was that the sketch felt like padding in an event that’s like drinking tech data from a fire hose.

    AppleInsider – Apple’s ‘Mother Nature’ sketch was a complete dud, and didn’t belong in the iPhone 15 event

    I do think it went on too long — the whole segment (sketch plus details) in fact was just 10 minutes long, not 20. But seemingly everyone, including me, felt like it lasted 20 minutes, which is never a good sign.

    Daring Fireball (John Gruber) – Thoughts and Observations on This Week’s ‘Wonderlust’ Apple Event

    There were some good points highlighted:

    • Recycled materials usage. There were also claims made about leather usage, but these only applied to Hermés straps sold within Apple’s own retail channels.
    • Taking plastic out of packaging. Apple has been minimising packaging by taking items out of the box (iPhone earphones, iPhone charger being two high profile examples). But now it’s taking plastic out of packaging as well. Its able to do this due to control of all aspects of its manufacturing process and packaging re-engineering. This is also pleasing to Apple shareholders. Given that Apple’s packaging is bought at scale, decreased materials usage and size means less risk of damage and reduced cost of manufacture & transport – any increased cost in design and packaging development will be amortised across millions of units. You see a similar benefit in Apple’s product materials as well such as aluminium laptop chassis.
    • Carbon offset for energy used not only in the manufacture of Apple Watch, but also throughout their expected life.
    • A move towards more ocean freight to reduce logistics carbon footprint, compared to air travel. This will have had a direct impact on the flexibility and responsiveness of Apple’s global supply chain, particularly custom specified products like non-standard MacBook Pro configurations.

    Apple still has a lot of problems however and here are three of the biggest:

    • With the exception of the Apple Pro, Mac models can no longer be upgraded, which reduces reparability and product life.
    • AirPods can’t be repaired, only thrown away. This is a problem for the wireless earbud category in general, but Apple are a leading player in the market and can set the the tone in the market through innovation.
    • The very nature of Apple’s business could be considered to drive excessive consumption. In sharp contrast, one of the traditional reasons why one owned a Mac was that you got a computer that was useful for longer. I am currently using a couple of Apple Thunderbolt displays that are between 8 and 12 years old. Prior to the iPhone I was using Macs that may have been eight years old by the time that i parted company with them.

    Incremental product improvements

    The announcements would have felt like tweaks for consumers. Apple Watches got more powerful processors for the first time. The iPhone Pro titanium frame would marginally reduce the weight of the handset. Apple has previously used titanium in laptops between 2001 and 2003, so the material isn’t completely new to the brand. The camera can create video and photography with depth for the Apple Vision Pro. Camera performance with darker skin tones has been improved to match Google Pixel driven innovation. But battery life is ‘about the same’ as previous generations.

    Many of the software improvements including live stickers are likely to be be in the iOS upgrade available to previous generations of phones.

    Ok, so what if anything was interesting about the event?

    There were three things that while they wouldn’t make me want to go out and buy a new device are still important developments, based on the direction that they are taking Apple products.

    Service integration

    Apple iPhone is moving beyond emergency satellite text services to breakdown care via satellite as well. It’s interesting that Apple is continuing to go beyond cellular. It is starting to look like the kind of differentiation Vertu used to enjoy with its single button concierge service. It supports the viewpoint that Apple is a luxury adjacent, if not luxury brand.

    Mechanical engineering on the iPhone camera

    Apple has managed to cram in a lens with an equivalent focal length of 77mm into the iPhone 15 Pro through a novel prismatic lens design. The device also uses a similar mechanism design to that used on Pentax DSLRs to compensate for device shake. The titanium frame probably provides additional rigidity for this system to work to its full potential. However the weight loss of the device might drive increased shake so there is a careful calibration in choices that the engineering team made.

    On-device machine learning

    The Apple Watch had redesigned silicon to move machine learning from the cloud or iPhone device on to the Watch itself. This improves response time, but also points to a move of taking large language model systems and neural networks out of the cloud and on to the device. Given that the watch also features ultra wideband wireless connectivity, it’s an especially interesting choice decoupling the watch from the iPhone.

    More Apple-related content here.