Ged Carroll

Category: marketing | 營銷 | 마케팅 | マーケティング

According to the AMA – Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large. This has contained a wide range of content as a section over the years including

  • Super Bowl advertising
  • Spanx
  • Content marketing
  • Fake product reviews on Amazon
  • Fear of finding out
  • Genesis the Korean luxury car brand
  • Guo chao – Chinese national pride
  • Harmony Korine’s creative work for 7-Eleven
  • Advertising legend Bill Bernbach
  • Japanese consumer insights
  • Chinese New Year adverts from China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore
  • Doughnutism
  • Consumer Electronics Show (CES)
  • Influencer promotions
  • A media diary
  • Luxe streetwear
  • Consumerology by marketing behaviour expert Phil Graves
  • Payola
  • Dettol’s back to work advertising campaign
  • Eat Your Greens edited by Wiemer Snijders
  • Dove #washtocare advertising campaign
  • The fallacy of generations such as gen-z
  • Cultural marketing with Stüssy
  • How Brands Grow Part 2 by Jenni Romaniuk and Byron Sharp
  • Facebook’s misleading ad metrics
  • The role of salience in advertising
  • SAS – What is truly Scandinavian? advertising campaign
  • Brand winter
  • Treasure hunt as defined by NPD is the process of consumers bargain hunting
  • Lovemarks
  • How Louis Vuitton has re-engineered its business to handle the modern luxury consumer’s needs and tastes
  • Korean TV shopping celebrity Choi Hyun woo
  • qCPM
  • Planning and communications
  • The Jeremy Renner store
  • Cashierless stores
  • BMW NEXTGen
  • Creativity in data event that I spoke at
  • Beauty marketing trends
  • Kraft Mothers Day marketing
  • RESIST – counter disinformation tool
  • Facebook pivots to WeChat’s business model
  • Smartphone launches

  • Patriot Act + more news

    PATRIOT Act

    PATRIOT Act clouds picture for tech | Politico – the PATRIOT Act passed in the wake of the September 11 attacks, giving the US government access to web services to try and fill in the gaps in intelligence. However the PATRIOT Act covers data held outside the US. So many foreign multinational companies are baulking at using US web services for their businesses. This is particularly important given the move from server and software apps to cloud computing. So the PATRIOT Act is disrupting US businesses from scaling

    Consumer behaviour

    Trendpool » Panasonic’s Female-Only Consumer Trial House

    Students of Virtual Schools Are Lagging in Proficiency – NYTimes.com – interesting that technology isn’t the panacea that people thought it would be in education. Smartboards haven’t been successful given their cost either

    Counterfeit goods losing attraction | SCMP.com – (paywall) Brands stand for quality – like they did in the Victorian era

    Young Women Go Back to School Instead of Work – NYTimes.com

    Economics

    More on What’s Left Over After Paying for Housing – The Atlantic – interesting article on housing and economics. Its less about house prices and more about income net of housing expenses

    Big Developers Dabble in Apartment Market – WSJ.com – decline in home ownership

    Finance

    Ray Dalio’s Richest and Strangest Hedge Fund : The New Yorker

    Innovation

    Single-Atom Wires Could Help Moore’s Law Live On

    Omron smartphone app comes close to instantaneous text translations | The Japan Times Online – like something straight out of a DARPA project

    Domestic robots failed to ride to rescue after No. 1 plant blew | The Japan Times Online – law of unintended consequences and innovation

    Liquid metal capsules used to make self-healing electronics | ExtremeTech

    Roboden: Japanese Company Develops World’s First Elastic Electrical Cable (Video) | TechCrunch

    Japan

    Woodford to sue Olympus, citing lack of investor support to get his job back ‹ Japan Today – not surprising he didn’t get support, first he trashes their shareholder value (probably exasperated by his theatre) then he asks for their help. They won’t care about the truth they’ll care about the 70 per cent drop in the market capitalisation

    Korea

    President Lee Myung-bak talked a lot about controlling high prices. – WSJ – growth and price inflation both considered issues

    Legal

    US Threatened To Blacklist Spain For Not Implementing Site Blocking Law | TorrentFreak

    London

    An Obligatory and Pointless Debate About the Olympics | VICE – but Vice nails it

    Luxury

    NetEase’s Luxury E-Commerce Site First Casualty Of 2012 « Jing Daily – interesting, especially since Netease has a lot of expertise in online businesses. I guess luxury handbags aren’t like World of Warcraft

    Will China’s E-Commerce Market See An Industry Shakeout In 2012? « Jing Daily

    Taking First-Class Coddling Above and Beyond – NYTimes.com – … first class represents less than 5 percent of all seats flown on long-haul routes, and business class accounts for 15 percent, those seats combined to generate 40 to 50 percent of airlines’ revenue, according to Peter Morris, the chief economist at Ascend, an aviation consulting firm

    Marketing

    UK marketers anticipate change: Warc.com – Ball & Hoolahan expecting marketing departments to get nuked in amalgamation with other departments

    Media

    Beijing Calling: The Trouble With China’s New English-Language News Network | Fast Company

    Retailing

    UK retailers face “carnage”: Warc.com – partly economics, partly industry structure due to etailing

    Wireless

    Nokia Moving to China from Singapore – WSJ – interesting complex reasons for choosing China or other countries outlined

    Interview with Murtazin – Will Microsoft Buy Nokia’s Smartphone Unit? – Forbes

    Text Messaging Is in Decline in Some Countries – NYTimes.com

    Nokia N9 outsells all other phones in Finland during October – Neowin.net – did Nokia’s move to Windows screw the pooch? Anecdotal evidence that it probably did. Also this code is now called Tinzen being pushed by Intel and Samsung

  • The North Face and Nike

    The North Face and Nike on marketing

    The North Face seems to have just peaked on its cultural moment in Korea. The North Face jackets are worn by all strata of society. Below is a Korean blog post that compares Its winter coats with different types of high school students as the brand has become so ubiquitous in South Korean school yards and on the backs of consumers during the winter months.

    The bottom of the blog post goes on to compare The North Face with the duffle coats worn by previous generation of school children in a mocking way.

    it is as much the winter uniform of the Korean salary man as his tie.

    The North Face sees itself as a technical brand rather than a true luxury brand, but the vast majority of its jackets don’t see the mountains and ski slopes for which they were originally designed. It has begun to treat itself as a premium brand with its purple label retro designs and different fabrics like Harris Tweed – currently exclusive to the Japanese market. But how can this be maintained if the brand becomes this overexposed?

    It is not a corner that it can easily get out of and technical innovation in the clothing design will be of limited use.

    North Face overexposure

    Part of the problem is the nature of Korean society itself which has a certain conformity to it. This means that once a trend picks up, it goes everywhere. But then because it goes everywhere it has a finite life. A small amount of tastemakers move on and the cycle begins again.

    The next winter jacket might be Canada Goose or Moncler.

    Contrast this with Nike: The Wall Street Journal has an interesting article about how Nike and Footlocker maximised revenue from the Jordan franchise through careful timing of limited product releases. More marketing related posts here.

  • Mr Pizza in Korea

    Pizza in Korea is a unique experience compared to other countries. Pizzas in Hong Kong were generally more premium and had more of a focus on sea food. Pizza in Korea was remarkably different:

    • Packaging – unlike the UK or most other countries I have been to for that matter, pizza can come in a four-colour patterned box. Part of the reason for this is cultural, Korea like Japan puts a lot of emphasis on presentation of products from product packaging design to the fit and finish of clothing. A second reason for the quality of the packaging is intense domestic competition: in addition to food mega-corporations Dominos Korea and similar brands also has its own giant brand: Mr Pizza with 350 branches in South Korea
    Mr. Pizza
    • Product – whilst UK pizzas follow US influences at the low end of the market and faux foodie Italian accents for ‘posh’ pizzas, Korean pizza options incorporate local foods including kimchi and bulgogi on the menu. This is especially true for this brand, though foreign brands like Pizza Hut try to adapt to local tastes too.

    About the company

    Mr. Pizza was founded in 1990. They have one branch in the US, one in Vietnam, 15 in China and some 350 branches in South Korea.

    They created a mockumentary  video The true origins of pizza as a satirical viral campaign to promote their brand, (presumably internationally). It considers the dish to be a Korean national treasure. However it did touch a nerve amongst other Asian countries as it’s similarity to Korean nationalist fringes meant that some of the film’s satire was lost to the audience.

    The company looked to further differentiate itself to eat-in diners by developing a new store format and sub-brand called MIPIHAUS. The concept of MIPIHAUS is to mix an art gallery environment with their restaurant. MIPI is a contraction of Mr. Pizza and the HAUS is a reference to the Bauhaus art movement.

  • Optimising for platforms

    Optimising for platforms rather than clients and audiences. Three years ago I taught an interactive marketing module at the business school of a private university in Barcelona. It was a great experience presenting to a number of senior executives and up-and-coming talent from various parts of Spanish industry including advertising and interactive agencies. I ended up learning from them as much as they learned from me.

    One of the attendees talked about listening to what his clients wanted, but that he really focused on building sites that Google wanted him to build; when the client wishes and Google were in conflict, Google won out. At the time the phrase struck me as it illustrated the pinnacle of Google’s power on the internet.

    The internet maybe open, it may be based on standards which means that you can see broadly the same experience across different platforms and browser software; but that’s no good if no one ever sees you site, modern-day equivalent of the classic philosophical question:

    If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

    However even if you don’t rank highly in Google, it can still be promoted in other ways. The other week I was at a conference when I heard one of the audience as a question about the wisdom of:

    Buiding a business in Mark’s house

    That is building a business on the Facebook eco-system. I was reminded of the earlier discussions I had in Barcelona around the power of Google.

    Facebook wasn’t a new idea, there have been social networks for as long as there has been the commercial internet.

    • The Well
    • AOL in some of its earliest incarnations as a BBS (bulletin board system) for Macintosh computers provided some of the functionality that Facebook pages and groups do now. AOL gave users 2MB to create their own personal presence on the web through a tool called Personal Publisher (it could be found with the keyword PP2 – it wasn’t called search back then) a kind of pre-Geocities.com page that does what your profile on Facebook does now
    • And if you enjoy Zynga’s Farmville or Cityville, these owe a huge debt to Lucasfilm’s Habitat developed by former Yahoo Randy Farmer and sat on the AOL platform some 25 years ago

    Many of the innovations that Facebook has since come out with like email and instant messaging, are features that AOL and others had since the internet first became popular. The contrast between the two is more about scale, whilst AOL was phenomenally popular with 30 million subscribers at its peak (who also paid for line access), and still reaches 112 million unique users on a monthly basis; but it was never omnipotent in the way that Facebook became.

    Facebook has an unsurpassed reach, kind of like a telephone directory for large swathes of the world – a de-facto real identity check. This powerful position is one that Clay Shirky says won’t be changed for the foreseeable future.

    You have to be on Facebook, even if you don’t engage with it (and engagement is something that Facebook seems having issues with for a good while).

    So businesses have gone to the logical step of building their web presence on a platform that they think is most consumers online homebase (as I read it described in Larry Weber’s Everywhere).

    So whilst Facebook may not control as much advertising budget as it likes; it wields a huge amount of consumer power and power over businesses that decide to use the social network as a platform – and that’s not likely to change any time soon.

    There are a number of factors to consider around Facebook:

    • Facebook abuses its position with consumers and I don’t need to discuss it here as it’s been well documented elsewhere already
    • Then there is the impermanence of web APIs, Nick Bradbury wrote a great post about this where he name-checked Facebook’s depreciated FBML, but to be fair, Google and Yahoo! have either changed the terms of APIs to make them less viable or got rid of them completely. So your platform may be here today gone tomorrow. From my experience, at the very least you are subject to browser compatibility problems and relatively high unpredictable down-times
    • It has become a crutch for marketing agencies in the way that the the answer to all consumer marketing used to be the 90-second television advertisement – I am surprised that so many brands are surrendering their reputation to Facebook given the concerns that had been voiced by marketers about Google’s power in recent times

    Marketers would be well advised to take a more pragmatic approach, think about where they are sending their traffic – who ‘owns’ the customer experience and take a portfolio or multi-channel approach to a campaign. More related content here.

    More information:

    Is it possible to replace Facebook? – interesting article by the research and development team at Norwegian state broadcaster NRK

    How Ford Blew It On Facebook | Advertising Age – why drive people via advertising to your Facebook page when you can drive them to your own property?

    The long-term failure of web APIs | Nick Bradbury

  • The futility of QRcodes on tube

    Traveling on the London Underground ‘tube’ recently I have noticed that more and more adverts have a QRcode. But the trips also highlighted the futility of using a QRcode, particularly on many of the deep lines.

    I am not too sure if tube QRcode is a recent phenomena or that I have been paying more attention as a number of the projects that I’ve been recently looking at are about the ‘web of no web‘: the interface between the web and the real world. I am a big fan of progressive approaches to marketing, however, the more I thought about the phenomena, the greater the waste of time that it seemed to be:

    • Londoners often joke about the tube being like cattle trucks; in reality European Union regulations wouldn’t allow livestock to travel on a train with the conditions of the tube on a hot summers day. A combination of overcrowding together with the lack of air conditioning  means that some of the lines can be as hot as a walk in the desert. The over-crowding also means that would be hard to take a picture of a QR code. So whilst the advert may have a large reach, the realistic reach of the QR code call to action is a lot smaller
    • So you happen to be lucky in terms of where the crush places you and try to snap the QR code with your phone. You probably won’t be successful, tube lines aren’t known for the smooth ride of say the Paris Métro, so you will be trying to hold your camera still whilst the train carriage rocks and sways in front of your smartphone. Your phone won’t be able to focus and take a clear image of the QR code. That’s one of the reason’s why there isn’t a tube advert shown here to illustrate this post, despite at least three attempts over the past week to snap a picture of an appropriate advert
    • Unlike other mass transit systems in the likes of Singapore and Hong Kong, huge high-traffic sections of the lines are underground or in such a deep cutting that they are inaccessible to mobile phone networks so QR code won’t take the audience through to an appropriate web page, but instead prompt a ‘network unavailable’ message

    The futility of QRcodes on the tube shows that the media buyers, marketers and or designers don’t pay much attention to the context of their advertisement art work, which could artificially skew campaign objectives and measurement adversely. In order to combat ‘the futility’, we need to go beyond TGI data and media packs. We can start this process by keeping our eyes open to the world around us.