Ged Carroll

Category: marketing | 營銷 | 마케팅 | マーケティング

According to the AMA – Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large. This has contained a wide range of content as a section over the years including

  • Super Bowl advertising
  • Spanx
  • Content marketing
  • Fake product reviews on Amazon
  • Fear of finding out
  • Genesis the Korean luxury car brand
  • Guo chao – Chinese national pride
  • Harmony Korine’s creative work for 7-Eleven
  • Advertising legend Bill Bernbach
  • Japanese consumer insights
  • Chinese New Year adverts from China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore
  • Doughnutism
  • Consumer Electronics Show (CES)
  • Influencer promotions
  • A media diary
  • Luxe streetwear
  • Consumerology by marketing behaviour expert Phil Graves
  • Payola
  • Dettol’s back to work advertising campaign
  • Eat Your Greens edited by Wiemer Snijders
  • Dove #washtocare advertising campaign
  • The fallacy of generations such as gen-z
  • Cultural marketing with Stüssy
  • How Brands Grow Part 2 by Jenni Romaniuk and Byron Sharp
  • Facebook’s misleading ad metrics
  • The role of salience in advertising
  • SAS – What is truly Scandinavian? advertising campaign
  • Brand winter
  • Treasure hunt as defined by NPD is the process of consumers bargain hunting
  • Lovemarks
  • How Louis Vuitton has re-engineered its business to handle the modern luxury consumer’s needs and tastes
  • Korean TV shopping celebrity Choi Hyun woo
  • qCPM
  • Planning and communications
  • The Jeremy Renner store
  • Cashierless stores
  • BMW NEXTGen
  • Creativity in data event that I spoke at
  • Beauty marketing trends
  • Kraft Mothers Day marketing
  • RESIST – counter disinformation tool
  • Facebook pivots to WeChat’s business model
  • Smartphone launches

  • Optimising for platforms

    Optimising for platforms rather than clients and audiences. Three years ago I taught an interactive marketing module at the business school of a private university in Barcelona. It was a great experience presenting to a number of senior executives and up-and-coming talent from various parts of Spanish industry including advertising and interactive agencies. I ended up learning from them as much as they learned from me.

    One of the attendees talked about listening to what his clients wanted, but that he really focused on building sites that Google wanted him to build; when the client wishes and Google were in conflict, Google won out. At the time the phrase struck me as it illustrated the pinnacle of Google’s power on the internet.

    The internet maybe open, it may be based on standards which means that you can see broadly the same experience across different platforms and browser software; but that’s no good if no one ever sees you site, modern-day equivalent of the classic philosophical question:

    If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

    However even if you don’t rank highly in Google, it can still be promoted in other ways. The other week I was at a conference when I heard one of the audience as a question about the wisdom of:

    Buiding a business in Mark’s house

    That is building a business on the Facebook eco-system. I was reminded of the earlier discussions I had in Barcelona around the power of Google.

    Facebook wasn’t a new idea, there have been social networks for as long as there has been the commercial internet.

    • The Well
    • AOL in some of its earliest incarnations as a BBS (bulletin board system) for Macintosh computers provided some of the functionality that Facebook pages and groups do now. AOL gave users 2MB to create their own personal presence on the web through a tool called Personal Publisher (it could be found with the keyword PP2 – it wasn’t called search back then) a kind of pre-Geocities.com page that does what your profile on Facebook does now
    • And if you enjoy Zynga’s Farmville or Cityville, these owe a huge debt to Lucasfilm’s Habitat developed by former Yahoo Randy Farmer and sat on the AOL platform some 25 years ago

    Many of the innovations that Facebook has since come out with like email and instant messaging, are features that AOL and others had since the internet first became popular. The contrast between the two is more about scale, whilst AOL was phenomenally popular with 30 million subscribers at its peak (who also paid for line access), and still reaches 112 million unique users on a monthly basis; but it was never omnipotent in the way that Facebook became.

    Facebook has an unsurpassed reach, kind of like a telephone directory for large swathes of the world – a de-facto real identity check. This powerful position is one that Clay Shirky says won’t be changed for the foreseeable future.

    You have to be on Facebook, even if you don’t engage with it (and engagement is something that Facebook seems having issues with for a good while).

    So businesses have gone to the logical step of building their web presence on a platform that they think is most consumers online homebase (as I read it described in Larry Weber’s Everywhere).

    So whilst Facebook may not control as much advertising budget as it likes; it wields a huge amount of consumer power and power over businesses that decide to use the social network as a platform – and that’s not likely to change any time soon.

    There are a number of factors to consider around Facebook:

    • Facebook abuses its position with consumers and I don’t need to discuss it here as it’s been well documented elsewhere already
    • Then there is the impermanence of web APIs, Nick Bradbury wrote a great post about this where he name-checked Facebook’s depreciated FBML, but to be fair, Google and Yahoo! have either changed the terms of APIs to make them less viable or got rid of them completely. So your platform may be here today gone tomorrow. From my experience, at the very least you are subject to browser compatibility problems and relatively high unpredictable down-times
    • It has become a crutch for marketing agencies in the way that the the answer to all consumer marketing used to be the 90-second television advertisement – I am surprised that so many brands are surrendering their reputation to Facebook given the concerns that had been voiced by marketers about Google’s power in recent times

    Marketers would be well advised to take a more pragmatic approach, think about where they are sending their traffic – who ‘owns’ the customer experience and take a portfolio or multi-channel approach to a campaign. More related content here.

    More information:

    Is it possible to replace Facebook? – interesting article by the research and development team at Norwegian state broadcaster NRK

    How Ford Blew It On Facebook | Advertising Age – why drive people via advertising to your Facebook page when you can drive them to your own property?

    The long-term failure of web APIs | Nick Bradbury

  • The futility of QRcodes on tube

    Traveling on the London Underground ‘tube’ recently I have noticed that more and more adverts have a QRcode. But the trips also highlighted the futility of using a QRcode, particularly on many of the deep lines.

    I am not too sure if tube QRcode is a recent phenomena or that I have been paying more attention as a number of the projects that I’ve been recently looking at are about the ‘web of no web‘: the interface between the web and the real world. I am a big fan of progressive approaches to marketing, however, the more I thought about the phenomena, the greater the waste of time that it seemed to be:

    • Londoners often joke about the tube being like cattle trucks; in reality European Union regulations wouldn’t allow livestock to travel on a train with the conditions of the tube on a hot summers day. A combination of overcrowding together with the lack of air conditioning  means that some of the lines can be as hot as a walk in the desert. The over-crowding also means that would be hard to take a picture of a QR code. So whilst the advert may have a large reach, the realistic reach of the QR code call to action is a lot smaller
    • So you happen to be lucky in terms of where the crush places you and try to snap the QR code with your phone. You probably won’t be successful, tube lines aren’t known for the smooth ride of say the Paris Métro, so you will be trying to hold your camera still whilst the train carriage rocks and sways in front of your smartphone. Your phone won’t be able to focus and take a clear image of the QR code. That’s one of the reason’s why there isn’t a tube advert shown here to illustrate this post, despite at least three attempts over the past week to snap a picture of an appropriate advert
    • Unlike other mass transit systems in the likes of Singapore and Hong Kong, huge high-traffic sections of the lines are underground or in such a deep cutting that they are inaccessible to mobile phone networks so QR code won’t take the audience through to an appropriate web page, but instead prompt a ‘network unavailable’ message

    The futility of QRcodes on the tube shows that the media buyers, marketers and or designers don’t pay much attention to the context of their advertisement art work, which could artificially skew campaign objectives and measurement adversely. In order to combat ‘the futility’, we need to go beyond TGI data and media packs. We can start this process by keeping our eyes open to the world around us.

  • Pepsi cola + more news

    Pepsi cola

    PepsiCo Gives Pepsi-Cola a Renewed Marketing Push – WSJ.com – You just can’t go dark on brands and expect them to hold their value (paywall). At a corporate level PepsiCo had tried to focus more on functional / healthy foods and so had under invested in Pepsi cola as a brand. Market share depends on market penetration and relative share of voice so keeping a steady investment in Pepsi cola would have made more sense, even if the ‘social good’ points aren’t earned. By comparison, Pepsi cola main competitor

    Ideas

    Phys Ed: The Science of Toning Shoes – NYTimes.com – is it about whether they work, or encourage people to exercise?

    Innovation

    Did Microsoft steal the Kinect? – Hack a Day – or is it like the light bulb which had about 8 inventors at the same time

    Nice try, Amazon: ‘One-click’ payment too obvious to patent • The Register

    TECHNOLOGY REPORT » Artificial Intelligence Pioneer Marvin Minsky on the current state of AI Research – a high tech research version of the ‘if you have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail’

    Japan

    Japan’s attention to detail is all in the delivery | The Japan Times Online – since security is no longer guaranteed, fun is a key decider in roles

    London

    Afternoon Tea – Japanese tourists love it apparently

    Luxury

    Prada Woos Young Chinese With Sister-Brand Miu Miu – WSJ

    Only In China: Paper Gucci Insert Causes Vogue China Buying Frenzy « Jing Daily – shows the power of the brand, however does this dilute the brand for purchasers?

    Watches Are Rediscovered by the Cellphone Generation – NYTimes.com – an interesting article. Watches aren’t only about what information they convey to the wearer, but also what they say to other people. I remember reading an article about stainless steel Seiko analogue watches being popular with Japanese job hunters who wanted to convey that they were punctual

    Security

    Microsoft admits Patriot Act can access EU-based cloud data | ZDNet – Can Microsoft guarantee that EU-stored data, held in EU based datacenters, will not leave the European Economic Area under any circumstances — even under a request by the Patriot Act? – This screws US technology sales in a number of areas

    Software

    Why Microsoft’s ‘single ecosystem’ for PCs and tablets carries huge risks | guardian.co.uk – unified user experience just isn’t going to cut it across the different user contexts

    Judge finds HTC guilty of infringing two Apple patents; could mean trouble for Android

    Amazon’s Appstore problems run deep: a developer speaks out | ExtremeTech – interesting that Amazon has had problems

    Telecoms

    I, Cringely » The enemy of my enemy – Bob Cringely on Google’s next likely move after losing the Nortel patent portfolio to an alliance of its enemies – RIM and Ericsson together put up $1.1 billion with Ericsson getting a fully paid-up license to the portfolio while RIM, as a Canadian company like Nortel, gets a paid-up license plus possibly some carry forward operating losses from Nortel, which has plenty of such losses to spare. For RIM the deal might actually have a net zero cost after tax savings, which the Canadian business press hasn’t yet figured out. Microsoft and Sony put up another $1 billion. There is a reportedly a side deal for about $400 million with EMC that has the storage company walking with sole ownership of an unspecified subset of the Nortel patents. Finally Apple put up $2 billion for outright ownership of Nortel’s Long Term Evolution (4G) patents as well as another package of patents supposedly intended to hobble Android.

  • Korean churches lessons

    I was talking with a friend over dinner about the success of Christian churches gaining a foothold in Korea. There are lessons learned from Korean churches in the way that they have managed to grow. On the face of it Korea would be stony ground for a ‘new religion’.  While Korea was part of the Japanese empire for a good while.  Korea still managed to maintain a strong culture and sense of identity of which Buddhist and Confucian belief systems are a key part. (This isn’t meant to be a theological or politics-related discussion).

    A number of the success factors struck me as being classic factors for marketing success as well:

    • Location – Buddhist temples tend to be away from the population up in the hills and the mountains. This is because Korean Buddhism, like Japanese Buddhism puts a strong emphasis and place on nature. Contrast this with churches that are located in people’s neighbourhoods. It’s easier to get to your place of worship. From a marketing point of view look how Apple has improved, first by going in-store at CompUSA and later building its own stores because it is easier for people to get to an Apple retailer
    • Ritual -this kind of extends from the first point, because when you can get to your place of worship easier, it is easier to do a regularly repeatable ritual that reinforces how you feel about your religion of choice. People go to Church every Sunday. Again if you can get people to do something on a regular basis they are more likely to incorporate your product or service into their lifestyle: Google being a great example, which is why Yahoo! failed to dislodge the search giant from its position despite having a comparable product five or so years ago
    • Evangelists – people who are involved in the Korean churches already seem to do a good job in terms of word-of-mouth marketing encouraging their friends to trial Christianity. If these guys had a net promoter index they would be hitting 8+ consistently; again mirroring Apple’s rise
    • Network effects – the rise of Christianity is a virtuous circle with more of the converted going out there bringing in yet more people. From a virtual standing start, now over 29 per cent of Koreans identified themselves as Christian according to 2005 Korean census data quoted by Wikipedia. I’ve been a Mac user long enough to remember when it was unusual to own Apple products. I was one of only two people in my halls of residence of college who had a Mac; yet now you can’t move in Starbucks because of the see of glowing Apple logos on the laptop lids
    • Smart engagement process – when you start at one of these churches they put you into a study group to get a download on what Christianity is. You get to meet more people, so your engagement with the church moves beyond the person who originally encouraged you to come along to other members of the church. In marketing companies are always looking for multiple touch-points of engagement. There’s definitely lessons learned from Korean churches in terms of customer experience and customer journey. 

    Korean christianity was covered in The Economist here. More marketing related posts here.

  • I want to work in PR…

    I’ve had a number of messages on LinkedIn and emails over the past few months as graduates started to look for first jobs and start with ‘I want to work in PR’. So I figured it might be useful sharing the advice here. There are lots of obvious things you can do to make you more employable in terms of highlighting potential useful skills and getting the basics right – spelling and grammar being a major bugbear.

    But beyond all that generic advice here are some things to think about that are PR-specific:

    Don’t lose heart. I want to work in PR means commitment to beat out thousands of other talented smart graduates.

    Let’s start off with the maths, the job market is basically a numbers game, I got my first agency role after sending out over 200 CVs/ job application forms. It is just a matter of being at the right place at the right time

    When I started off, being a mature graduate, coming from an Irish working class household in the North West of England put me at a disadvantage. The clients and colleagues were all bothered about mojitos, wine and six nations rugby. The industry is still as white, middle class and English as it ever was. You have to be the change and that is really lonely. You’ll be on your own. Mentors can help, but you’ll be relying on your own resilience whether you’re:

      • From another country
      • Working class
      • Teetolaller
      • From an ethnic minority
      • Being older than the ‘norm’

    Classism and age are the last acceptable prejudices, but the others will be signalled through micro-aggressions, gaslighting and omission. Your allies won’t always be allies, dragging you down will help them get a leg up.

    So how can you tilt the odds in your favour?

    • You can increase your odds by becoming more visible through social media, just in the same way that you probably wouldn’t buy a brand that you couldn’t find on Google, having your own personal brand that is visible in a positive way online can only be a good thing. I realise that this isn’t necessarily easy however if your name is John Smith
    • Many of applicants have read all the pieces about innovative ways of applying for jobs and every second CV seems to have a QRcode on it. Innovation is great; my former colleague and friend Doug Winfield got himself noticed using Facebook advertising a year or two ago and is now holding down a senior role with with MS&L in New York. All I am going to say about innovation is that whilst it might get you  on to the initial pile of CVs to read; you also need to think about your CV also in terms of usability. When interviewing people you want to get the salient points of the CV prior to meeting them as easily as possible mainly because your working life will be time poor. Many larger HR departments will look to save your data on a database that they can interrogate, that means your information needs to be easy to put in. So there is a balance in your decision: getting noticed versus getting a job in competitive environments
    • Go where there will be less competition. How about applying to agencies working in less popular sectors and by looking to do PR at small-to-medium sized firms or even junior roles in-house.  Whilst people want to work with brands that their friends will know, third sector PR where they can feel good about themselves, or do celebrity PR – that is only a small part of the industry. I focused on the technology sector when I started off mainly because it was (and still is if we’re honest about it) deeply unsexy. The vast majority of the population don’t care about ERP, SCM, BPM and BPO; nor should they
    • Take advantage of disruption in the PR industry. Digital has started progressive change in the PR industry. The media industry is being disrupted; there are less gainfully-employed journalists writing more coverage, and publications  are earning less money from product and recruitment ads. This means that there less opportunities for traditional media relations. So PR has had to look to new influencers like bloggers and having direct dialogue with perspective product / service purchasers. This overlaps with business functions such as sales and customer services and other marketing disciplines. At the moment media buying, search and advertising agencies are staffing up with digital PR expertise and are killing PR agencies in new business pitch situations. Consequently it is worthwhile looking beyond the PR sector for PR roles