Blog

  • Social web looking backwards and forwards

    I was asked about where I thought social media was going a number of times over recent months. So with that in mind I thought I would throw a distillation of the questions that I have been asked out there and solicit answers from the community. I have put my own responses in italics.

    What do you think that the biggest challenges have been in social media up to now?

    Agencies that don’t get the ‘new’ non-linear multi-channel nature of storytelling, in which storytelling has moved to a multi-way engagement process. Storytelling is becoming less and less of a linear process which you can complete the boxes and then roll-out. From TV dramas like CSI in which non-mainstream plot devices move a story rattling through time and space to digital communications which allow a narrative to be atomised, entered-and-left at any point and remixed by the audience.

    Joseph Campbell’s mono-myth concept doesn’t cope with the digital world that well. In PR terms, storytelling has moved from the traditional Hansel & Gretel bread crumbs analogue exemplified by traditional PR thinking leading the journalist by the nose to a desired end-point; to a lego construction brick analogue where the audience can take the story elements and build their own model without your context. Provide them with the elements, be human, be nice, be useful and if possible remarkable. Provide kudos where it is due and be prepared for a kicking if you deserve it.

    Agencies that cling to the old way of thinking, even as they maybe doing digital work: are setting themselves up for a fall. They are in denial of the changes happening around them. These changes won’t happen overnight, but they are happening; just as in the same way that the car replaced the horse and the airplane replaced the passenger liner. It is doing a disservice to their clients, themselves and their employees.

    The second thing that I find frustrating is more of a tactical item, but shows a lack of thought around how people consume media in a personal way and respecting the audience’s attention. I remain unconvinced by many peoples fixation on digital video production, when they grossly under-estimate the power, popularity and utility of images.

    Thinking about video and audio from a technical point-of-view it can be far from straightforward for a blogger to embed on their site, this is dependant on the platform that they are using and whether they have the right plug-in installed on their blogging software. Posting images is much straightforward.

    content vs attention

    Then there is the covenant made with an audience when you present them with content. Video requires our absolute attention, whereas audio allows us to multi-task (drivetime radio). With text or images we can easily scan to see if the content is of interest and listen to other content or nip back and re-visit content easily at any time. 

    What have you found provided the most excitement and hope in social media up to now?

    The first thing that I have found most exciting and has given me the most hope about social media is the innovative ways that people have used social media for good and the way positive communities form. From customers helping each other out in the absence of proper customer support to charitable giving and the formation of communities of likeminded people. In a world that is increasingly cynical, social media has allowed people to connect in a way that demonstrates the best in people.

    The second item that I have found most exciting is the way that it has become not only easier to publish content but also to integrate that content with great services like Google Earth, Flickr and Yahoo! APIs. Its only a matter of time before PR practitioners master these fully.

    Looking forward at marketing communications and PR: what are the greatest areas of concern?

    Practitioners be it marketers, advertising agencies or PR agencies aren’t learning lessons of etiquette and respect fast enough. I have been really concerned about the ins and outs of the recent #Moonfruit campaign. This moral ambiguity is likely to create a vacuum that regulation could quite easily attempt to fill that void.

    If marketers and PR people continue to abuse the trust of audiences then this will ruin the potential of social media for everybody.

    Looking forward again: what offers the most hope and excitement for the future?

    I want to put the development of the web and social media into some context before I answer this question:

    Changes on the web

    Broadly you can think of the development of the web and social media as we know it as having had three acts:

    • Act one is what most people would call web 1.0 where the web was largely a direct analogue of traditional publishing. Media plaforms cost 100,000s to tens of millions of pounds. From a marketing perspective this was the ‘web as brochure’ and if you were lucky an order form as well
    • Act two is the nebulous web 2.0 or web as a platform. And whilst the best examples of web 2.0 are no longer new, the understanding of them from a marketing and communications point-of-view is still incomplete. Partly because of the shift in mindset required between ‘act one’ and ‘act two’
    • The third act that I think we are entering is the web of data or the web of things. Information is contained in small chunks whether its a twitter update, a QR code or microformat like a hCard. And we can see this atomisation taking place even in press releases if we look at the Todd Defren and the SHIFT team have been modifying their social media template over the past few years

    You can see how the attitude of communicators needed to change with these technical phases:

    Changes in online comms


    The parts that I feel most excited about moving forward for the next few years are:

    • Continuing to think about how social media campaigns can still be useful
    • Thinking about how campaigns can be atomised, still be effective and be refined through improved measurement
    • There are some answers that I don’t get yet, which I think will be interesting to explore in more depth. In particular how atomised data and conversations happening across a plethora of channels are going to affect the context of content, and how that will affect the communications function

    What’s the three biggest lessons that you’ve learned up to now?

    • Goals: always strive be nice, be human, be useful and try to be remarkable in your campaigns
    • Consideration: the cost of content is not only about the monetary cost, but also non-monetary economics: attention and ‘whuffie’. You shouldn’t make a video because you can, but because you are providing the target audience with something which they will find useful or remarkable. The richer the media, the greater the burden of responsibility the communicator has. If you want consumers to respect your brand, respect their time and attention
    • Attitude: stay curious, stay hungry 

    I will tag Stephen Waddington, John Kerr, Doug Winfield, Jonny Rosemont and Adam Parker.

  • Herbivore man + more news

    Herbivore man

    FT.com: Korea’s white van man is a herbivore“Herbivore man is a dandy metrosexual with an abhorrence of martial arts. He has no qualms about ordering wine or soft drinks instead of Korea’s fiery spirits, de rigueur among the old guard. Dried-fish woman is an impeccably dressed model employee, but after work she just wants to lounge on the sofa in a track suit, watch television and munch on dried squid. Both are rebels from Korea’s crippling and prohibitively expensive treadmill of education, marriage and family, hailed as the be-all and end-all by the taciturn older generation. As consumers, they lavish money on their free time, buying DVDs, furniture and comfort food. In a society that prides itself on being collectivist, they are suspicious loners. Herbivore man is particularly distasteful to the macho fathers and grandfathers whose values were forged in Korea’s agricultural and highly militarised past.” – Herbivore man likely didn’t benefit from the explosion of the chaebols, instead herbivore man has seen the likes of Samsung strangle opportunity

    Design

    Not Your Daddy’s Longboard | Fast Company

    Economics

    Economics: What went wrong with economics | The Economist 16th July 2009

    Lending binge | The Economist – interesting Chinese economic statistics and analysis

    How to

    Airport travelators actually slow passengers down – New Scientist (July 18, 2009) – Something to bear in mind when navigating around an airport.

    Ideas

    The Meteoric Rise of the App Store

    Japan

    JeanSnow.net — The Otaku Encyclopedia – everything you wanted to know about manga, anime and more

    Trends in Japan » Tokyo Girls Collection Fall 2009 – great article on the brand diversification strategy of Tokyo Girls Collection. Their last event attracted over 23,000 in-person attendees. Interesting the way that they have expanded into health & wellness.

    Luxury

    Burberry and the Next Big Brands to Come From the East | The Green Room | Fast Company

    Media

    Twitter is not for teens, Morgan Stanley told by 15-year-old expert | Business | guardian.co.uk – it amazes me how the media industry was blown away by this, given that there are lots of sources which already have the same content as this ‘revolutionary’ research note

    Stephen Fry Admits He’s a BitTorrent Pirate | TorrentFreak

    Online

    FT.com / Technology – Yahoo renews vow to fight Microsoft – yeah right. Bartz has already put the white flag up the pole in Sunnyvale with the search deal and her comments about the Yahoo! China deal.

    Software

    Why Google’s Chrome OS Is Not in Your Future | TechWatch | Fast Company

    Does Social Networking Breed Social Division? – NYTimes.com

    Digital Evangelist: All that is wrong with the US view of mobile

    Daring Fireball: Microsoft’s Long, Slow Decline – not sure that it is a long slow decline. Microsoft has moved to being a value company like GE or Caterpillar rather than being a growth company like Google. Apple has always positioned itself as a popular but premium product company. Discussions around the Daring Fireball post over at Hack News flagged lots of interesting points both for and against.

    Web of no web

    Mobile augmented reality: Reality, improved | The Economist

    Wireless

    Six in 10 companies plan to skip Windows 7: survey | Technology | Reuters

    HK green light for fixed-mobile portability – but the telecoms companies will fight this tooth and nail

    Digital Evangelist: Confusion over the Handset market

  • Mirrorshades – The Cyberpunk Anthology edited by Bruce Sterling

    Cyberpunk is a type of science fiction that has been very influential in the creation of the web as we know it. As with most predictions about the future, the now has both over-and-under achieved. Since we are at an economic inflection point, I thought I’d revisit one of the seminal publications of the cyberpunk genre Mirrorshades.

    Mirrorshades

    Mirrorshades is a collection of stories that were created by authors considered to be representative of that genre by one of their own Bruce Sterling. Mirrorshades refers to the Oakley type-lenses in sunglasses that were considered to be a cultural artifact for this genre, in the same way that chromed rocket fins graced US-made cars of the 1950s and 60s.

    In some ways the stories echoed the kind of ideas I would expect appearing in feature articles of Wired magazine: private artificial islands based on a libertarian ideal to fuel commerce, artificial-eye implants, radical Islam-inspired cyber-terrorism and gene therapy. All of this feels familiar in a post-truth era of late stage capitalism where authoritarianism vies with liberal democracy for legitimancy

    Others were exceptionally dated: depending on the the Soviet Bloc to still be a bulwark against global capitalism. The rampant artificial drug use in the stories mirrored the US decent from hippy-inspired pot heads to mainstream cocaine use and new drugs that were then coming online including crack cocaine and MDMA. There was an assumption that the leisure pharmaceutical industry would carry on this spurt of commercial innovation through product development.

    Mirrorshades is a good read, but the ideas have been so pillaged by later works that you have to keep yourself in check and remember that for much of the films and books in this area, Mirrorshades (often filtered through other authors later works) was the genesis; the source material from which they sprang. More book reviews here.

  • Bing versus search giants

    I have been playing with Bing for a little while now, so here’s my thoughts. The first thing that struck me about Bing is that most media commentators don’t get it. A classic example of what I mean is The search continues by Paul Taylor of the Financial Times (June 4, 2008). In his article Paul compares Bing to Google.

    Steve Ballmer would definitely like to be Google, because he knows that the Microsoft heartland of productivity and enterprise software is going to be offering much lower margins when it goes into cloud computing. Ballmer has no choice but to go after the search market.  But in order to fight the shark in the fish tank he first of all has to get Microsoft’s search products up to a challenger weight to take on Google. The first way that this is happening is the efforts that Microsoft has done to use Google’s size and success against itself in a set of regulatory judo moves. The second step is try try and fatten up on smaller fry.

    If you are going to gobble up one of the smaller fish you don’t have that many choices. Whilst Yahoo! got mauled by Microsoft, having to jettison Yang from the CEO chair along the way, it is still alive and kicking with a larger marketshare than MSN/Live/Bing search (though curiosity kicked Bing into second place for a few days during its launch).

    The ideal second choice is Ask.com.

    Why Ask.com?

    • Ask has moved away from competing in the main search space by focusing on a demographic focused on ‘married women who need help with their busy lives’. It has essentially put up the white flag of surrender
    • Ask doesn’t have marketing muscle, it doesn’t have budgets for high-profile advertising campaigns. Microsoft has cash to burn on hiring agency marketing muscle in the form of Crispin Porter + Bogusky. Television is an ideal vehicle to reach married women who need help with their busy lives and advertising agencies like Crispin  Porter + Bogusky love TV adverts
    • Ask’s promise of being a natural language search engine where you could ask questions set the bar low enough that Microsoft could at least try and match it with Bing by utilising the expertise and technology Microsoft got when it acquired PowerSet
    • A lot of Ask’s traffic comes from toolbars that sit in the chrome of a browser (thats the grey bit above the web page where the address box and the buttons are).  Given that in 2005,  at one point Microsoft was even tagging Ask’s MyWebSearch toolbar as a “Toolbar Browser Hijacker”, it would be easy to sweep those busy married women along with a new complex web browser like IE8 that they don’t have the time to customise and a search web page that looks a lot like what they usually go to anyway

    Plagiarism

    Bing JPG

    In case you missed that last statement the likeness of the Ask.com home page and the Bing home page are strikingly similar in customisation and layout.

    Ask JPG

    The positioning against Google is try and give Bing some credibility but the results and the search audience experience says that its all about Ask.com. Do you think Bing would have really got any air time from Paul Taylor if they had said we’ve brought out a new search engine that is just like Ask.com?

    Industry innovator?

    It would seriously damage Microsoft’s aspiration to be seen as an industry innovator rather than kludging together products that kind of look like the real thing. The copier is something that the company has been dubbed with countless times before for good reason:

    • DOS versus CP/M
    • Windows versus the Mac
    • Zune versus iPod/iTunes
    • SQL Server versus Oracle or IBM DB2
    • XBox versus PlayStation

    Bing isn’t truly innovative (I am sure people worked hard to get it out the door in the same way they would at a Russian tractor factory, but its not innovative in a transformational way); its an imitation of a well-established fading product in Ask. It is the search engine equivalent of an over-the-hill punch drunk journeyman boxer who is easy prey for a frustrated large but untalented bully to reign down punches on. The whole thing feels a bit grubby to me: less successful crooning innovator Bing Crosby (he helped pioneer the use of tape recorders in studios, funding Ampex’s research into the area building on AEG’s Magnetophon), more like the mafioso catchphrase Bada Bing.

  • Microsoft IE + other news

    Microsoft IE

    It is hard to explain how dominant Microsoft IE or Internet Explorer was for online access. For years Microsoft IE was the tip of a range of technologies that integrated with online experiences that sustained Windows dominance.

    I was a late adapter to online banking since for years my bank required the use of Microsoft IE. Microsoft IE security technology was required for anything in Korea due to a government mandated ActiveX security digital certificate that relied on Microsoft IE.

    EU Plans Fresh Strike on Microsoft – WSJ.com – there a flaw in it as Microsoft could still configure the browsers and tweak them to make them difficult to alter guaranteeing MSN / Live / Bing ‘unwilling’ traffic off 404 pages and the search box in the browser chrome

    Microsoft calls off EU antitrust hearing over IE – Microsoft legal counsel accused EU of being inflexible in that they wouldn’t fit in around MS’ busy diary to discuss Microsoft IE

    It’s Time For Microsoft To Face Reality About Search And The Internet (MSFT)

    Business

    Pricing, WOM, PR Efforts Get Recession Boost

    Consumer behaviour

    Generation Mobile: Internet and Online Media Usage on Mobile Phones among Low-Income Urban Youth in Cape Town, South Africa

    A.L.L. = Afghan Lessons Learned for Soldiers – interesting site by US servicemen looking to plug the knowledge gaps that US DoD training leaves. Using a blog platform for simplicity

    Design

    Cathay Pacific – Meet the team who go the extra mile to make you feel special – really nice bit of flash work that encourages you to play with the animation

    Google eats Microsoft’s lunch with the launch of Google Wave | Econsultancy – really surprised at how hard Microsoft PR and marketing teams got played on this launch. The ironic thing was that Google took this straight out of the Microsoft playbook

    Gadget

    LED TVs hit the market, but will they sell? » VentureBeat

    Media

    Social media reality check

    China’s Mobile Internet Advertising | Digital China Guide

    UK government challenged by alternative Digital Britain report – Brand Republic News – Brand Republic

    The Media Business: Seeing through the Haze Surrounding Websites, Blogs and Social Media

    The Media Business: The Challenges of Online News Micropayments and Subscriptions

    Online

    How can Twitter dig itself out of hashtag hell? | Blog | Econsultancy

    Mobile Internet in China is about to heat up! | Digital China Guide

    Fake Reviews. Now now kids, play nice… at Malcolm Barclay

    Retailing

    Multiple Brand Personality Disorder: Who’s confusing who? | Econsultancy

    Victoria’s Secret enters mobile commerce arena – Mobile Marketer – Commerce

    ICFF: Kikkerland’s Booth Becomes a Meal for Those in Need – PSFK.com

    Bloggasm » Anti-Starbucks filmmakers hijack the coffee company’s own Twitter marketing campaign

    Software

    Panasonic: Open-source smartphones are the future » VentureBeat – Panasonic is going to re-enter foreign mobile phone markets with new open source-based phones

    Telecoms

    Total Telecom – Sea change at Nokia – interesting analysis of the Nokia business